BUCKYLE;1264458; said:
Football is a fall sport played in outdoor stadiums, for the most part. Big ten teams are built to play in the elements. Not saying SEC schools couldn't by any means. Just that we'll never know, because they rarely, if ever do.
The idea that cold weather kids play better in cold weather environments has some serious holes in the argument.
Mr. Gamble seemed to do just fine for the the Buckeyes and he was from Miami.
On the flip side, Knowshon has excelled for the Dawgs and he never huffs and puffs because of the humidity down here and he is from New Jersey.
If Georgia (god willing) were to play in this years national title game and all of a sudden the event got moved to Lincoln Financial Field in Philly - i'd imagine the only thing that would be done is Richt would take the team up there 4-8 days early to practice in the weather. 18-22 year olds are damn resilient.
----
My neutrality argument was based on weather only. Is it fair the Tigers got to play 2 hours form campus for their National Title runs? No, of course not.
But to my knowledge - the only teams whose fan base has trouble showing up is U of Miami. Nebraska travels, Ohio State travels, Georgia travels, Oklahoma travels.
I don't blame the NCAA for putting the games in desireable destinations.
Now - if you want to make the argument that stadium ticket sales should be more equally divided - I'd pat you on the back and hold your coat while you lectured. The ideal that 8-14,000 tickets should be held for local area purchase is crap (and likely accomodated for the 60/40 or 65/35 Tigers to Buckeyes in New Orleans last year). The towns benefit enough from the increase tourism. 5,000 local tickets held is plenty.