• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

RB Maurice Wells (Official Thread)

Rivals.com has Mo as the best freshman running back in the big 10
Best of the Big Ten -- Running Backs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mike Wachsman
BuckeyeSports.com Staff Writer

(BuckeyeSports.com debuts a new feature, focusing on the best players in the Big Ten, designed to get fans excited and incite debate. This is purely our opinion, but we do try to use numbers to back those opinions up. On most days we'll look at the top five players at a position, though in some instances we'll expand it to 10. Today we look at the running backs.)

RUNNING BACKS

The Big Ten has long been thought of as a three-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust conference, but surveying the landscape in 2005, nothing could be farther from the truth.


Associated Press

Minnesota's Laurence Maroney will be running away from the Big Ten this season.
Gone are the days when every team in the league had a punishing rushing attack. Ohio State and Michigan made a living beating opponents into submission, but even Indiana, Northwestern and Minnesota have gotten into the act in recent years.

Don't get me wrong. There's talent in the Big Ten running back corps. But there just isn't much depth.

Beyond the top four or so, it's kind of a crapshoot.

There will be debates from their faithful about what order Minnesota's Laurence Maroney and Michigan's Mike Hart belong, but beyond that there's not much else that's known.

We're going to try to sort out this mess, however, with our rundown of the top running backs in the Big Ten.

TAILBACKS
1. Laurence Maroney, Minnesota (Jr.) -- The fastest, quickest back in the conference, Maroney has the tenacity and power to bang it up inside. He can cut on a dime and get to top speed in a heartbeat. He has been nicked up in the past, and without Marion Barber there will be some questions about him handling 280-300 carries. But he's easily the best talent in the league and could flirt with a 2,000 yard year.
2004 Numbers (Carries/Yards/YPC/TD) -- 217/1,348/6.2/12

2. Mike Hart, Michigan (Soph.) -- He ran for 121 yards in his first start against San Diego State and never looked back. He put together three straight 200-yard rushing games, a school record. And he held up to the pounding despite being just 5-9. A darter with great agility and balance, Hart's low center of gravity makes him hard to bring down. He's good about picking up yards after first contact, too. He'll likely be spelled a bit this year by hotshot recruit Kevin Grady, but that doesn't diminish his talent.
2004 Numbers -- 282/1,455/5.2/9

3. Pierre Thomas, Illinois (Jr.) -- Gets loss in the abyss that is Illini football, but this kid can play. He has nifty moves that make him elusive and he prides himself on being a north-south runner. He has excellent balance and the patience and vision to wait for the holes. If Illinois gets any kind of play from its quarterback, he could be primed for a big year.
2004 Numbers -- 152/893/5.9/8

4. Jason Teague, Michigan State (Sr.) -- His eligibility situation is tenuous due to some off-field issues, but when he's playing he gives the Spartans offense a toughness that it sometimes lacks. He loves picking up the tough yards inside and has decent speed. Not truly a home run threat, Teague is at his best near the goal line. His numbers may not be huge because John L. Smith likes to employ a committee approach in the backfield, but the kid has talent.
2004 Numbers -- 150/688/4.8/8

5. Brian Calhoun, Wisconsin (Jr.) -- Put together a pair of solid seasons at Colorado before transferring to the Badgers, and he'll provide the speed element that has become a staple in Madison. The Badgers love the zone stretch, and Calhoun has the speed and shiftiness to make it work. He also has excellent hands, so he could be lined up wide on occasion. Wisconsin may have some major questions this year, but running back isn't one of them.
2004 Numbers -- Sat out the year as a transfer.

Breakout Potential -- Iowa's Albert Young, who missed last year with a knee injury. A great blend of power and size, he also has elusiveness and is Iowa's fastest back. If he's healthy, he'll put up big-time numbers.

Best Freshman -- Ohio State's Maurice Wells will have a chance to shine due to the unsettled nature of the backfield. He has a burst to the hole, is great in the open field and can catch the ball. May not be a 20-carries a game type right off the bat, but has the skill to be the Buckeyes featured option. He gets the nod over Grady, Michigan State's Javon Ringer and Northwestern's Tyrell Sutton.

FULLBACKS
1. Matt Bernstein, Wisconsin (Sr.) -- Though he's a pile-mover, Bernstein is at his best putting his head down and leading tailbacks into the hole.
2004 Numbers -- 83/300/3.6/1

2. Jason Davis, Illinois (Sr.) -- A good runner with fine balance, Davis may be called upon to block a little more under Ron Zook. He has excellent hands (41-340-2) and will be used underneath a bunch.
2004 Numbers -- 49/230/4.7/1

3. Justin Valentine, Minnesota (Soph.) -- Doesn't carry the ball a ton, but doesn't have to with Maroney around. Has a good solid frame and is a threat around the goal-line. Could be asked to shoulder a little more of the workload this season.
2004 Numbers -- 19/57/3.0/4

Tomorrow -- Receivers
 
Upvote 0
Every time I read this thread about Maurice I get more excited about the season. It's just something about this kid and what I am expecting/hoping he can do. He might be the missing piece to the puzzle (face it, we have no running game like we used to/need until next year with CWells).
 
Upvote 0
Folanator said:
Is it me, or is it embarrassing that we have NO ONE other than MW on that list.

Man oh man I cannot wait until we have a running game.
True but Michigan probably didnt have anyone on that list last year either [other than one of the freshmen] and that turned out for them pretty well. With our OL and WRs spreading the field, I suspect that list will have one of our guys in the top3 by the end of the season. If not, we are in for a long one again.
 
Upvote 0
gobucks19 said:
True but Michigan probably didnt have anyone on that list last year either [other than one of the freshmen] and that turned out for them pretty well. With our OL and WRs spreading the field, I suspect that list will have one of our guys in the top3 by the end of the season. If not, we are in for a long one again.
I do not dissagree. I believe that we are going to be much improved with our O line, the fear of the deep ball and passing game, along with the maturation of all of our RB's.
We have not been able to run the ball since "he who must not be named" left. I just cannot wait to see it actually happen.
 
Upvote 0
neither can any of the rest of us...
i long for the days when Tressel can just line 'em up in the I, and pound the ball straight down the D's throats...

i long for the day when the Buckeyes can run the ball EVERY play of a drive, and punch into the endzone...

i remember Tennessee played Nebraska in the Orange Bow, i think, after the '97 season... the Vols tried an on-side kick with 7 or 8 minutes left in the game, and the announcers were questioning the logic... the Huskers proceeded to run the ball 14 consecutive times, and ran out the clock... it was a thing of beauty... i long for those days at Ohio State...
 
Upvote 0
lvbuckeye said:
neither can any of the rest of us...
i long for the days when Tressel can just line 'em up in the I, and pound the ball straight down the D's throats...

i long for the day when the Buckeyes can run the ball EVERY play of a drive, and punch into the endzone...
Didnt we run the ball every play on the 98/99 yard drive against scUM last year? I was in such a daze at how well we played that day that I cannot honestly remember.
 
Upvote 0
nope definitely not... the one thing we did not do well is run once we got beyond our own 30. We simply could not move the ball on the ground with a RB after that (Smith did well running tho).
 
Upvote 0
Ross also looked like the second coming of Eddie George out there. That game continued to lessen my respect for the big12. Texas better bring a lot, b/c they've got a bad trend to turn around (especially in conjunction with how overrated OU has been for years, not just last year).

probably tiem for a thread split.
 
Upvote 0
lvbuckeye said:
i long for the day when the Buckeyes can run the ball EVERY play of a drive, and punch into the endzone...

the Huskers proceeded to run the ball 14 consecutive times, and ran out the clock... it was a thing of beauty... I long for those days at Ohio State...
Hmmmm...I personally like how Holmes and Gonzales burned the tsun DBs last year, or how Ginn's turned a short reception into a long TD run while making at least three OK. ST. defenders looked like eight graders. I am sure there are more, but you might disagree that they are a thing of beauty...please note that I am not saying a running TD is any less exciting.
 
Upvote 0
Ok, when JT goes on record saying he's excited about a player, I think its time to start wondering what he can do this year. I'm not expecting him to be as big as #13 was, but most likely these are recent comments after Maurice arrived earlier this summer.

http://www.the-ozone.net/football/2005/BigTenmeetings/noteandquotebook080505.htm
"A guy that we're excited about is Maurice Wells who is a running back, but there will be someone else other than Maurice too," Tressel predicted.
" I'm hoping Maurice will be one of them that will make an impact," Tressel said.​

 
Upvote 0
Back
Top