OSU_D/;2028703; said:
Can't disagree more. As each year goes by and the Big 10 worsens while the SEC wins another BCSNCG the percentages are changing.
In 2006 KH was practically on his knees in front of the Big 10 and thought there should be a OSU, UM rematch. All of his comments toward OSU and the Big 10 were hyperbole then as they are hyperbole now.
So what's the difference? The other conference is winning. I haven't met a single person in the anti-herbie hyperbole crowd who gave a second thought to the fellatio in 2006. People only care when it is against OSU/Big 10 now.
In 2006, prior to the bowl games, everyone thought that Ohio State and TSUN were the two best teams. Possibly, they were, but neither coach got his team ready on bowl game day. If the SEC is so advanced over the B1G, why don't the overall conference bowl records the last decade support that?
We can go back and cite several examples of Herbstreit's supposed support or lack of support of the Buckeyes. 2003/2004 ring a bell? Oh wait, Herbstreit was strangely silent while ESPN repeated lie after lie after two NCAA investigations.
All of this misses the point.
The point is that Herbstreit is simply reading a script. He's an "entertainer" not a "sports analyst". It isn't his opinion. It's ESPiN's opinion. He says what he is told to say.
Check out the websites of those who have left (e.g., Dan Patrick) and read the stories that they tell. This constant harping against the B1G is meant to discourage recruits from considering B1G schools. The reason why is because it is in ESPiN's interest that the SEC and Big 12 do well.
For Herbstreit and ESPiN, it's business.
For most Buckeye fans, someone that they once respected despite his modest accomplishments at Ohio State, is now irrelevant.
ESPiN "talent" tell the public what their told to tell us. The problem that Buckeye fans have with Herbstreit is that, for a paycheck, he is willing to play out that script when he often knows that what he is saying isn't true or is, at the very least, much exaggerated.