Muck;2347254; said:
I'm sorry my hyperbole bent your nose out of shape. Of course it still doesn't change the fact that many people were fully counting those top 3 at their position 5* players as virtual locks for this class months ago. Nor does it change the fact that this class is not fundamentally different in talent level from the '13 class at this time last year. The 'isn't quite stacking up' meme comes from comparing it to the mythical class that some believe Ohio State should have right now rather than actual classes of years past.
I think hopes versus expectations need delineated. Many thought, aside from any sort of wild conjecture, that some of these players were OSU leans or at least that OSU would be in it until NLOID. Seeing a mass fallout and commitments elsewhere early on is discouraging but I don't see any real panic on this board (per the usual, which is good). And sure, many (including myself) had some of these players in our early "Predictions." However, they are just that...guesses on the best info available and not "virtual locks" in the minds of many. I don't know which players you are talking about but guys like Hand, Blanding, Peppers, Watson, Kitt, Hurd, Nelson, Sawyer, Harris, Byrne, Ferns, etc. were guys we thought we had a fighting chance with but just didn't land. The only guy I could think of with "virtual lock" status that looks a tad more iffy now is McMillan and that is far from over.
As for talent now versus talent in the '13 class I will just disagree on. This is a fine class with a ton of talent so far but last year was just lights out from beginning to end, particularly with high end talent (Bosa, Burrows, Apple, Marshall, Baugh, Barrett, Elliott, Price, and Lisle were all in early). I see some solid players with plenty of room to develop thus far, but no immediate star potential outside of Webb. All of that being said, that is not really an indictment of this class rather than the absurd talent we landed in the last class.
I am not trying to make any sort of personal jab, as you are one of the posters I truly respect on here. It just seemed some rational critique and discussion was being labeled as the type of ledge-toeing shenanigans that happens on all the other boards and I just don't see that. And as MD pointed out (and as I truly believe), UFM & Co. are too good not to close this class out strong. Personally I think we started off with a strong foundation but will add the more "elite" type guys as the recruiting season progresses (McMillan, Prince, Holmes, Lattimore, etc.).
WaitingforKickoff;2347255; said:
With all due respect, as recently as a couple of weeks ago, you were openly voicing your disapproval of the offer to Harris. Now you are disapproving that the staff offered too late? Can't have a cake and eat it too.
I will admit to coming around on Harris after seeing improvement on the camp circuit...I had only seen his film and don't have the luxury of watching him throw in person/on the camp circuit. Frankly I am not sold on Harris being anywhere near an elite QB yet, but I do think he could be a BCS caliber QB that could do well here. Regardless, I was just saying that waiting on him so long put as at a disadvantage in terms of getting a QB the staff wanted, not that I am dying to have him in this class.
The only real puzzle to me was waiting so long on Allen and not offering Barker. QBs typically commit early and we unabashedly put our eggs in the Watson basket until May. They wanted to show they were set on Watson...Watson may not have got that message but other QBs did. I was all for that approach when Watson looked butter-soft in his commitment to Clemson, but it just didn't work out so far (we'll see if Watson sticks if/when Morris bolts)...not claiming any real foresight, just hindsight.