Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LitlBuck;2357361; said:I was wondering if anyone was going to change their prediction list with the offer to Braxton Berrios
wadc45;2357920; said:Working off the prediction of 23 and with Knox and Hooker in I'm going with something similar to MD's current list:
Samuel
Lattimore
Smith
McMillian
Holley
Brown
Prince
I think Samuel, Lattimore, Smith and McMillian are as close to in as could be in July.
I think OSU leads or is at least at the top with others for Prince, Holley and Brown.
My guess is they think at least 1-2 of the OL can come in and provide depth right away. That's why I don't have Mavety on the list. But maybe if he pulls the trigger for OSU in August they pass on Prince? I just don't see how you squeeze in both.
The biggest problem for me is leaving Gesicki off the list. Maybe they see him as an X and thus he could beat Brown to the punch?
Also, have to wonder why they offered Berrios at this stage if they feel good about Brown and Samuel. Unless they plan to take three more playmakers at WR/Hybrid because they see Campbell as purely a RB at the next level after seeing him on the camp circuit. Or is it first two of Berrios, Brown, Gesicki and Samuel? I just don't see how it's not Samuel and one other playmaker...and for now I'm going with Brown.
And to think I was originally hoping they were going to fight for a guy like Solomon Thomas until the end. No way they have room for two more DL.
Again, this is all off the notion that 23 is the absolute max...if that changes, my list changes.
wadc45;2357920; said:Working off the prediction of 23 and with Knox and Hooker in I'm going with something similar to MD's current list:
Samuel
Lattimore
Smith
McMillian
Holley
Brown
Prince
I think Samuel, Lattimore, Smith and McMillian are as close to in as could be in July.
I think OSU leads or is at least at the top with others for Prince, Holley and Brown.
My guess is they think at least 1-2 of the OL can come in and provide depth right away. That's why I don't have Mavety on the list. But maybe if he pulls the trigger for OSU in August they pass on Prince? I just don't see how you squeeze in both.
The biggest problem for me is leaving Gesicki off the list. Maybe they see him as an X and thus he could beat Brown to the punch?
Also, have to wonder why they offered Berrios at this stage if they feel good about Brown and Samuel. Unless they plan to take three more playmakers at WR/Hybrid because they see Campbell as purely a RB at the next level after seeing him on the camp circuit. Or is it first two of Berrios, Brown, Gesicki and Samuel? I just don't see how it's not Samuel and one other playmaker...and for now I'm going with Brown.
And to think I was originally hoping they were going to fight for a guy like Solomon Thomas until the end. No way they have room for two more DL.
Again, this is all off the notion that 23 is the absolute max...if that changes, my list changes.
UpNorth_Buckeye;2357932; said:So with the hooker pickup, does that make the smith signing less needed? Him and lattimore are a package deal, but if they weren't would we still pursue him? In other words, were we looking for two safeties (if that's what hooker will be) in this class?
WaitingforKickoff;2357971; said:I think guys whom Urban has banked spots for til NSD are:
Lattimore
Smith
McMillian
Prince
WaitingforKickoff;2357971; said:I think they take two between Thompson, Brown, Samuel and Berrios. With Heuerman/Vannett in the program, I don't think TE is a priority this year, especially since we missed on a few preferred options in the beginning.
MD Buckeye;2357978; said:Coach Meyer being the lead recruiter for Curtis Samuel tells me all I need to know......Samuel will have a spot if he wants in.
MD Buckeye;2357978; said:I agree here & said the same to wad in a text. I think Baugh gets redshirted, beefed up & you have your TE/H of the future. They could also be looking at Gesicki at X and he'd be included in that group of Thompson, Brown, Samuel & Berrios.