Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When he was at OSU, he was a good offensive rebounder and shot blocker. Of course, he was very aggressive going after the blocked shot, which caused many fouls and not the greatest defensive rebounding.Giddens thing is so dumb. Not only did he quit on this team once, but he averaged 1.6 PPG on Alabama. What does he add?
But we have to be able to do better than this right? I'm still hoping this is some kind of April Fools joke.When he was at OSU, he was a good offensive rebounder and shot blocker. Of course, he was very aggressive going after the blocked shot, which caused many fouls and not the greatest defensive rebounding.
have you thought about the possibility that the staff huffs paint?The only thing I can figure is the staff already knows Brunk ain't happening.
to be fair, some of my most lucid thoughts come after a can of rust-oleum.Oh man, do we need to clean up another thread ala Urban Meyer (Florida Coach)?
At least my last post was kind
Bball staff getting ready for their roster meetingto be fair, some of my most lucid thoughts come after a can of rust-oleum.
I am not saying this in relation to Brunk or anyone in particular - OK, you got me, it is about recruiting Morris Udeze - but sometimes I get the sense that CH likes to have a lot of recruiting lines cast in the lake so to speak to give themselves options in case of necessity. They tend to get linked with many marginal prospects more often than OSU used to under Matta. Part of that is I feel like CH plans to build depth and use all of his scholarships in one way or another (more sit out transfer years and redshirts possibly), while Matta didn't really want to build the bench down to the 11th and 12th guy so long as he had a strong top-6 or 7, and naturally the guys at the end of the bench are going to be more marginal. As long as they aren't really trying to reel those marginal guys in for being starters and are just putting themselves in position in case a need for depth arises, then it is fine. Also, I believe CH recognizes one way for him to be able to steal some wins until the roster is where he wants it to be in terms of top talent will be by having a versatile roster with guys he can mix and match from game to game and in certain in-game situations.have you thought about the possibility that the staff huffs paint?
Well there isn't really anywhere to go but up with his stats last season.I know we dont like some aspects of Giddens's game, but at the same time we also have to be realistic. There don't tend to be any very good options in the grad transfer market for a school like OSU that will actually improve the team. Most everyone who is a grad transfer, including Brunk, will be overestimated based on schools being desperate to add players that are seemingly a sure thing. I feel like the appropriate default belief of fans should be that grad transfers can only be expected to be replacement level players that do not improve your team. But we all know fans expect big things from all grad transfers, and are routinely disappointed.
If by chance Giddens joins the team again, it will be to be a backup center, maybe to play 12-15 minutes a game, and most certainly he is a high major player body- and athleticism-wise. Backup center grad transfer is not a role that is going to make or break this year's team. I feel like he was underused at Alabama, especially last year, so he will probably be the rare grad transfer that actually improves his stats in his fifth year.
Bball staff getting ready for their roster meeting