Football Commentary: Coaches argue with press corps
Should teams be able to regulate coverage?
Ken Fowler
Issue date: 9/27/07
Section: Sports
Charlie Weis had a bit of a moment last week.
Eric Hansen of the South Bend Tribune wrote a lengthy "analysis" in last Thursday's paper, which asked the reader to imagine he were Charlie Weis and explored what Weis was thinking going into the Michigan State game.
In reality, it was a column - which is fine. Its toughest words went like this:
"You talked a good game about nasty, but until now you weren't doing anything to actually build it. You can point the finger at offensive line coach John Latina, but his lines at Ole Miss were considered among the best-coached and toughest in the SEC."
Weis took offense and answered Hansen's unrelated question at a news conference the next day with a quick retort and a jab at Hansen.
"Well, would you like for me to answer this in the first person, second person or third person?" Weis asked. "Well, you probably have that answer. So we'll move on. Next question."
The exchange was available for all to see via an on-line video, but the athletic department omitted the words from the "official" transcript posted on-line. Associate Athletic Director John Heisler said Tuesday that Notre Dame routinely edits its transcripts, provided by a third party, for clarity's sake when specific questions would not make sense for those reading.
While official transcripts should include complete, unedited quotations for honesty's sake - and to retain the legitimacy of the transcript itself - there is a separate, important point raised by the exchange.
Weis is either right or wrong; there's no need to ignore the conflict of opinions.
Such conflicts between coaches and media happen, and they are far from rare. Leaders in pressure-packed jobs get mad all the time. Sometimes their anger is justified; sometimes it's not. Always, however, it's entertaining. As a friend of mine said earlier this week, people love you when you're human. Humans have a tendency to get mad, react stupidly and then repent. That's life.
(ctd.)