buckalum01
They Call Me Assassin
I think the Jarrett situation is typical of how the NCAA works- the situation is seemingly cut and dry, the potential penalty is seemingly straight forward, yet the actual penalty differs from past occurances. I don't think Jarrett was trying to defraud anybody or trying to gain extra benefit, or doing anything here as nefarious as taking money from a booster (no matter the definition of a booster including a parent). It was a seemingly innocent mistake that I could understand happening.
Hell, when I went to OSU, my roommates dad supplemented the overall cost of the rent for all 3 of us because he wanted to and was/is filthy rich. That would have made me ineligible if I was on the football team. HOWEVER... It seems the NCAA just thought well, it was minor- no harm no foul (which I think is great), but they failed to apply the same standards and penalties in this case as they have in the past- which is wrong. I don't blame Jarrett for that. I blame the NCAA.
I also want to say that it would probably go a long way towards better compliance if the NCAA was easier to work with; easier to translate; easier to know their expectations; easier to predict thier punishments and penalties-i.e. TRANSPARENT.
Understanding compliance requirements- either on a student-athlete level or on a school level- is so ambiguous yet at the same time so hard-line that it is no wonder to me that parents, boosters, athletes, coaches, schools, etc. have a difficult time towing the line.
I know I'm preaching to the choir with you guys, but its just so frustrating!!
Hell, when I went to OSU, my roommates dad supplemented the overall cost of the rent for all 3 of us because he wanted to and was/is filthy rich. That would have made me ineligible if I was on the football team. HOWEVER... It seems the NCAA just thought well, it was minor- no harm no foul (which I think is great), but they failed to apply the same standards and penalties in this case as they have in the past- which is wrong. I don't blame Jarrett for that. I blame the NCAA.
I also want to say that it would probably go a long way towards better compliance if the NCAA was easier to work with; easier to translate; easier to know their expectations; easier to predict thier punishments and penalties-i.e. TRANSPARENT.
Understanding compliance requirements- either on a student-athlete level or on a school level- is so ambiguous yet at the same time so hard-line that it is no wonder to me that parents, boosters, athletes, coaches, schools, etc. have a difficult time towing the line.
I know I'm preaching to the choir with you guys, but its just so frustrating!!
Upvote
0