• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Mark Sanchez (Philadelphia Eagles)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Mark Sanchez is the ideal fit for a West Coast Offense in the NFL. Seattle would be a great fit. San Fransisco would be a great fit, if that is the offense that Singletary wants to use. Sanchez needs to be in an offense where his skillset can be best utilized. Sanchez, to me, seems like he is at his best when he can hit passes that are 10 yards to 30 yards down the field. Yeah, he can throw the deep ball. And, yeah, he can throw a screen. But, when he gets to attack the field, he can make time with his feet and throw a beautiful ball.

Stafford would be a better fit for a run-happy team, where he only needs to make plays on 3rd down.

Best QB prospect in 2009, imo, is Nate Davis. MAC QBs always know how to do well with bad talent around them.
 
Upvote 0
crybaby.jpg



Class act, Petey.
 
Upvote 0
Not to defend Pete, but I thought his tone was a bit "educational". I see what people are saying in regards to it being inappropriate for that audience, but he does have a different perspective, having been on both sides of these types of equations, than many other coaches.


I doubt he takes much of a hit from this, as he's seen as a candid, shoot from the hip, kind of guy. That's probably all this will end up being seen as.
 
Upvote 0
Pete Carroll - News

Pete's conduct here has become indefensible. It's one thing to disagree with Sanchez's decision behind closed doors, trying to convince him to come back. It's entirely another thing to rip him on the way out after he's made his decision.

He says that he is acting in Mark's best interests. But he's wrong here. If he truly believes he would have been better served coming back for another year, he "was" acting in his best interests by trying to convince him to come back. Now, there's no way to say that's he's doing anything for Mark Sanchez. All he's doing now is hurting Sanchez.

And I must say that I find it a little strange that the draft evaluation for Sanchez came back second round - when I haven't seen anything else indicate that he's a second-rounder. Either one of three things are happening there: 1) Pete's lying; 2) The evaluation was pre-Rose Bowl, and Pete was spinning it to make it sound as if the Rose Bowl meant nothing for his draft status; or 3) Someone connected to the USC program was responsible for putting together the evaluation.

Because he's no second-rounder... unless of course Pete continues to tear him down enough to the GMs out there.
 
Upvote 0
Not to defend Pete, but I thought his tone was a bit "educational". I see what people are saying in regards to it being inappropriate for that audience, but he does have a different perspective, having been on both sides of these types of equations, than many other coaches.
Click to expand...
He made it quite clear in the PMS radio interview that his goal was to send a message, and didn't want folks to think he was fine with it. Someone forgot to tell him it was Mark's moment. The team meeting was a fine place for that 'message'. You don't have to agree with the decision and can even mention that in passing, but the kid gave you 4 seasons, two of which he sat behind an average (by USC standards) QB.
Because he's no second-rounder... unless of course Pete continues to tear him down enough to the GMs out there.
Click to expand...
I'd love to hear Outside the Lines interview a scout/personnel guy anonymously to hear whether that affected his stock at all.
 
Upvote 0
Can we get rid of the "dirty" tag. Not to be overly PC (no pun intended), but even if whoever posted it didn't mean it the wrong way, given Sanchez's heritage I think it could be taken the wrong way. . . .
 
Upvote 0
sepia5;1383408; said:
Can we get rid of the "dirty" tag. Not to be overly PC (no pun intended), but even if whoever posted it didn't mean it the wrong way, given Sanchez's heritage I think it could be taken the wrong way. . . .
Click to expand...

Perhaps it could, but those same folks probably never heard of 'Urban Dictionary', and also might think that your dog has its paw on a dildo.

I've gotta believe that somebody with an avatar tag line of "Tim Tebow = pendejo" is joking.
 
Upvote 0
ochre;1383395; said:
Not to defend Pete, but I thought his tone was a bit "educational". I see what people are saying in regards to it being inappropriate for that audience, but he does have a different perspective, having been on both sides of these types of equations, than many other coaches.
Click to expand...


If you really believe that,then this is your lucky day. I have a contact in Nigeria that has a fortune to give away and your name was drawn from the BP membership.
 
Upvote 0
sepia5;1383408; said:
Can we get rid of the "dirty" tag. Not to be overly PC (no pun intended), but even if whoever posted it didn't mean it the wrong way, given Sanchez's heritage I think it could be taken the wrong way. . . .
Click to expand...

Not if you know what a "Dirty Sanchez" is. Perhaps we could re-tag it as
"Two girls one cup".
 
Upvote 0
Draft Daddy: NFL Draft News and Knowledge
A few weeks ago N.F.L. Commissioner Roger Goodell warned some of the elite college sophomore and junior quarterbacks to think long and hard before declaring for the draft, because he noted almost all of the top quarterbacks in the N.F.L. today stayed in school until they were seniors. He also mentioned that most of the quarterbacks that declared early over the last several years were busts. Yesterday, an angry Pete Carroll reiterated this when he told the media how disappointed he was that U.S.C. quarterback Mark Sanchez was leaving early.
Were commissioner Goodell and U.S.C. head coach Pete Carroll needlessly exaggerating just to scare these youngsters off? We put together a list of Quarterbacks that have Declared Early since 1989 and it does seem like the vast majority of these signal callers were/are very mediocre or are downright draft busts. If history is any guide, Matt Stafford, Mark Sanchez, Josh Freeman and Nate Davis better prepare themselves for a very bumpy ride going forward.
DD.comment: We did our best to come up with this list, but it's tough because we couldn't find an official list anywhere and had to do it by memory. We think we have all the key names, but if any of our readers see any omissions, please contact us and tell us who we left off. We are looking for any notable quarterbacks that entered the draft early (via the regular or supplemental draft) since 1989. We are only listing prospects that were drafted or felt they had a strong chance to be drafted when they declared, not long shots who only declared because they were failing out of school or just wanted to quit school and were looking for their five minutes of fame.
*** L.A. Times writer Bill Plaschke blasts U.S.C head coach Pete Carroll for his demeanor at Mark Sanchez's press conference yesterday.
DD.comment: All our sources tell us Sanchez should be a first round pick, but it's real early in the process and who knows what will happen. Also, with all due respect to Mr. Plaschke, we'd love to know who has ranked Sanchez as the 10th best prospect in the draft? It can't be the N.F.L. Draft Advisory Committee, because they only dole out round projections (1st round, 2nd-3rd, 4th-7th and free agent). We are left wondering if Bill got that gaudy projection from the same notable pair that had Andre Woodson projected as a future #1 overall pick throughout the spring, summer and fall of 2007?
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
I wonder how many RB, LB and DB prospects have declared early and turned out to be mediocre/bust?

QB's arent the only position to provide such a let down.

Or mabye, how many #1 or first round picks turned out to be a dissapointment?


Seriously, that list is quite dumb. There's no formula for how a QB or any player for that matter will pan out in the NFL. There have been tons of people to play into their seniors years at every position and end up not working out. Its evaluating talent, working with that talent and hoping(praying) it produces on the field.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top