Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
CentralMOBuck;2281828; said:Let?s focus on rules that matter and let our kids eat
I somewhat agree with what Calipari is saying. But can every school give their players the same preferential treatment (own private dorm, kitchen, etc.) Kentucky gives their players? No.
Mike80;2281835; said:I wonder what rules violation is he trying to get out in front of....
Jaxbuck;2281843; said:This
I'm thinking the next sound byte is something along the lines of "my son can walk down to the ATM and get cash out whenever he wants to without wondering who funded the account. Why can't everyone?"
ORD_Buckeye;2281847; said:That, and he's trying to create an environment where every one-and-done lottery pick will come to Necktucky because they're treated in a way that UNC, Duke, Kansas or Indiana won't treat them.
Essentially, he's pushing the envelope to the very limits to get as close to the good ol' Wilkinson Hall days (without the cocaine and machine guns, perhaps) as he can.
The one-and-done rule was a huge mistake. The D-Roses of the world don't want anything to do with a college campus, so why force them onto one in some scripted farce.
I tend to agree with that, from a college basketball perspective. But from the NBA's perspective, I think the rule makes some sense. If I'm going to gamble a few million dollars on a teenager, I'd rather have at least one year of college ball to evaluate him on, instead of having to go solely by measurables, and high school/AAU. Too much money and too little evidence.ORD_Buckeye;2281847; said:The one-and-done rule was a huge mistake. The D-Roses of the world don't want anything to do with a college campus, so why force them onto one in some scripted farce.
This rule had [censored]-all to do with what was good for college basketball and [censored]-all to do with what was good for the young men. It had everything to do with what was good for the NBA management and for established NBA players. It's part of the NBA collective bargaining agreement; NCAA had no voice whatsoever.zincfinger;2281860; said:I tend to agree with that, from a college basketball perspective. But from the NBA's perspective, I think the rule makes some sense. If I'm going to gamble a few million dollars on a teenager, I'd rather have at least one year of college ball to evaluate him on, instead of having to go solely by measurables, and high school/AAU. Too much money and too little evidence.
Mike80;2281835; said:I wonder what rules violation is he trying to get out in front of....