Anybody lumping coach Tressel into the boat with the other 10.1 violations is quite simply comparing apples to oranges.
A quick look at the NCAA major violations database will tell you that where this case differs from the others is that coach Tressel did not lie to cover up anything that he or his staff did, but what some of his player did.
That is a huge distinction. Every other major violation in the database involved coaches covering up improper things that they did.
Also, though he likely did submit improper compliance forms, he did not lie or mislead the NCAA when questioned about it.
I am not one who believes he did nothing wrong, but I most certainly am one who believes that the good he has done outweighs the bad.
Folks calling for his head, stating that "In the real world" someone would be instantly fired for breaking a rule obviously has no sense or reality or has no experience working with a truly valuable employee.
Any time you have an employee who breaks a rule.. you look at the total picture and determine if the employee is an asset or a liability.
I believe even with this setback, Jim is still an asset to the university and should remain our coach.
Compare Jim to all of the other coaches who have been accused of a 10.1 violation and I guarantee that there is no comparison when it comes to Jim's upside.