OK, but my point is that vs. scUM 05, Iowa 08, OSU 14, etc., etc., the Penn State football players and coaches made thousands of decisions and took thousands of actions that determined those games. The only way the logic works that PSU is getting jobbed by officials is if the decisions/actions are not being accounted for, and any official's call is being looked at in a vacuum, separate from all the things PSU had control of during those games. Ohio State hasn't been losing much lately, but when they have (MSU 13, Clemson 13-14, VT 14) I don't remember anyone on this forum or others talking about officiating. It was more about Ohio State's execution - or lack thereof, and the opponent's good play. The bottom line is that if one or two calls determine whether you win or lose, then you have put yourself in the situation where one or two calls can cost you.
They are not my offensive line. I have never met any one of them or have any kind of relationship to them other than as a fan. If they hold and it gets called then I'm not complaining. If they hold and are good enough at it to get away with it, then that's awesome. Consider that maybe the reason they don't get called for holding much is that they are superbly coached and are really good at their craft. You might also want to consider that officials can't see everything, and also that what many fans think is holding isn't really holding. Those are all alternatives to pulling the bias or incompetence card. I think B1G officials are pretty good. They make the right calls most of the time, blow a few, and have a few that are questionable every game. My problem begins when someone suggests they determine a game - any game. It's just not happening.