Gatorubet;1912457; said:That is exactly correct. Now (and I neither expect it or wish it), the current NCAA investigation as set forth in the NOA is not limited to the withholding of information about tatgate and the signed compliance cert. That is part of it to be sure. But the request made to tOSU was for an investigation of the people involved, players, staff and Cicero and Rife - of what was sold, when, and how much. A request for any other players - even those who graduated or left - who may have sold stuff. Who - if anyone else among tOSU staff knew anything about the extra benefits, and what did they know?
So people need to know that the parameters of the investigation are not limited to Tress. The NCAA has specifically asked for any an all other violations uncovered in the investigation that tOSU is about to do. They can always reserve the right to find that the institution failed at something, if new info is found, or if the sales were known or found to have gone on for some time. A sporadic deal might be viewed differently than an on-going thing over many years. (Don't ask me how the staff is supposed to know who got a tat or how much it cost - but if some low level staff guy is asked and says "Oh - that. Yeah, our guys have done that for some time, no biggie" then it all may blow up in ways nobody knows)
I'm nor trying to rumor monger Bill, but the specific requests of tOSU by the NCAA in the NOA ask for all of that, and the NCAA always leaves itself the flexibility to get into more things in any investigation. I guess I'm saying that there is no evidence of any impropriety by tOSU, but reminding everyone that the investigation an fairly be said to just be starting again - and is not in any way limited to just the known Tress issue. The institution looks pretty clean, but that will depend upon the depth of the self report investigation and the information turned up in this second one. *
*In the FSU deal they did self investigations more than once - answered the NCAA's NOA more than once - had a request for more information, and (shocking, I know) the second one turned up the bigger problem.
That's typical language in an NCAA Notice of Allegations. Here's TSUN's from last year, for anybody that cares.
It's possible that something else could still be uncovered, but please don't feel that you personally need to repeatedly remind us of that. You posted that yesterday here in this thread.
Upvote
0