buckeyesin07;1932141; said:
That was more to refute your point that I was the only one saying the officiating was poor. You missed my point entirely.
Hmmm, maybe. It sounded more like a "others agree with me so my point is valid" argument but whatever. I don't think I ever said that you were the only person, but you were the only person saying it with the hyperbole you used.
Oh no? You must have forgotten this statement that you made earlier while patting yourself on the back, in which you claimed that my assertion that the officiating was biased "was utterly proved false by the first sentence in my initial reply." The first sentence in your reply (you know, the one that "utterly proved my assertion false") dealt with--wait for it--the number of fouls called on each team. So my question is--do you backpedal much? You might want to reread your previous posts before posting next time.
I find it funny that someone whose intial post I questioned -which contained neither anecdotal nor statistical evidence to back up the statement (about not being able to conclude anything but a pro-Heat rigged finals) - is so up in arms about me conceding a somewhat lack of substance in my post. The numbers on their own do, IMO, refute that original point you made, only because that point was so over-the-top. If it were so obvious the NBA really wanted to rig the officiating and had done so to the point that there was no arguing it, the numbers wouldn't have been so even (or in a lot of cases, favored the Mavs). My argument, as you wisely pointed out, could have had more substance by taking a look at the context of the fouls though.
The fact that I only referenced one call, when others have described a lot more, means that there only was one bad call in the game, right? It couldn't be that enough bad calls in the Heat's favor have been referenced and that no one has the time to go back through and chronicle each bad call, could it? Great logic.
I never said there was one bad call in the game in the Heat's favor. In fact, I have mentioned that there were 2 indisputable ones, but thanks for putting words in my mouth. You were talking about the context of the fouls though, that I couldn't simply look at the numbers. I then did so, using your criteria of aggressiveness and timing of calls. I said that I thought both teams were equally aggressive, and that the only bad call that came at a critical moment in the game was the Dirk slap. You, on the other hand, have not given your thoughts on the aggressiveness and effort of either team last night and how that contributed to the officiating and foul totals. And quite frankly, at this point I am tired of debating a point I know I am right about, so I don't care.
My original point stands: Saying the only conclusion you can draw from the efforts of the officials last night is that the NBA has the refs rigging the finals is asinine. The real lack of statistical and anecdotal evidence showing a great advantage in illegitimate calls received by the Heat supports this. Both teams had calls (or a lack thereof) go for and against them. Saying you thought the officiating was bad or slightly slanted would not have drawn such a response from me, but that hyperbole did. I will be here during game 2 so we can debate about the officiating (or, hopefully, the actual game) again then. Have a good one.