Irrelevent.[/quote]actually it's FAR from irrelevant. In the NFL, the champion is determined on the field, with playoffs where there is little complaining that a serious super bowl contender was left out the running. In CFB, the champion is determined first in the polls, then on the field... and too often a very deserving team (Auburn, USC, OSU '98) is left out of the title game.
Of course the winner of the BCS title game is considered the champion. But it does make you wonder if the two had nearly equal seasons, if they split the two games.
You keep playing the 'improvement' card, I don't see how that factors into his rationale at all.
Personally, I think UT should get another shot if they are the most deserving team. That being said, if OSU destroys UT 38-17 in september, and then Troy/Ginn get hurt and OSU loses by 7 in january, it would make it interesting.
Of course the winner of the BCS title game is considered the champion. But it does make you wonder if the two had nearly equal seasons, if they split the two games.
You keep playing the 'improvement' card, I don't see how that factors into his rationale at all.
Personally, I think UT should get another shot if they are the most deserving team. That being said, if OSU destroys UT 38-17 in september, and then Troy/Ginn get hurt and OSU loses by 7 in january, it would make it interesting.
Upvote
0