Well, its a discussion for the PoliForum, but one can only guess how hopping mad conservatives are about the government getting involved in this one.
while that makes cute rhetoric, im not sure it is accurate. the no govt loons, on either side of the political spectrum, make up probably 1% or less of the country. for every anti govt lefty whacko environmental terrorist, g20 rioter, etc their is probably a right wing anti govt terrorist (tim mcvey, etc) to match for sure. however, to say that no govt is a widespread view across any major political group is probably categorized as nothing more than a wildly inaccurate statement.
without sending this directly to the poli forum, where im sure it is headed anyways, it is important to look at the govt response to a disaster in federal waters, while the wh seems to be outraged with any comparison to katrina, see fox news vs gibbs yesterday, i think their is a comparison. of course you have to set aside the la states rights issues with katrina that are not present in the oil disaster. but 1-something disastrous happened. 2-plans were in place and were not implemented. 3-inability to respond quickly, efficiently and accurately to the situation. while i have felt that politicizing katirna was a mistake and instead not making it a learning experience, i fear the same issue will occur here. what needs to be done, once this thing is "dealt" with. be that 10 more days, 30 days or 90 days, is a look inside what was done, how it was done, why it was done, and determining how/where/why changes should be made. i for one hope that the right doesnt take the card out of the lefts playbook and make commentary about how obama hates (fill in group) or attempt to place failure on this and it make it a waterloo, etc. that being said the difficulty of the situation has to be weighed with the recent terror attacks in nyc, the floods killing dozens in tenn, etc. its a tough gig. and the approach should be to prevent events like this in the future...