Anyone look at the most recent Sports Illustrated?
They had a pretty interesting section on the speed in college football.
The took the NFL combine 40 times over the last 5 years which came out to be over 1000 players.
Anyway, based on the averages of those times the SEC is faster than the Big 10 at skill positions with a difference of 4.6071 versus 4.6189 for the Big 10.
The Big 10 was actually tops in the D line category with an average time of 4.9217 while the SEC was DEAD LAST with an average time of 5.0050.
The point is that the differences in these times is really negligible. Like the above poster said, if you play fast then you are fast.
It's just laziness on the part of Derpstriet and the other heads when they trot out the SEC speed argument. The SEC is just like every other big conference. They have their good teams and their junk teams. The other conferences just don't have the world wide leader to pimp them morning, noon and night.
EDIT By the way, the good teams in the SEC are REALLY good this year. I was kind of down on Bama for awhile, but they might just be the juggernaut that they were made out to be. Just waiting for the ESPN round table on whether or not Bama would beat the Browns.