BuckeyeBill
All-American
It took me a while (I'm kinda slow to pick up on things sometimes) but I eventually figured it out. You wouldn't tune in MSNBC and expect to hear them cheerfully praising the Tea Party folks. You wouldn't switch to Fox News and think you're going to hear them promoting some liberal policy. Depending on your personal viewpoint, watching these channels can be about as much fun as hitting yourself in the head with a hammer.
ESPiN is the sports equivalent of MSNBC/Fox. Anyone who watches ESPiN expecting to see Sports Journalism (who, what, when, where, why, how--free of editorial content or sensationalism) is going to be at the least disappointed, and worse, frequently misled. Agenda-driven Journalism, well, that should be an oxymoron. Sad fact is, Yellow is the dominant color of the dominant "news" media now.
I know I'm stating the obvious. But, BP does exist to provide free online therapy, doesn't it?
The thing I don't get is that their business model basically attempts to piss off one fan base or another, presumably with the thought that it will drive ratings. And maybe it does. But I know for me, personally, I used to have Sports Center on damn near 24/7, or one of their other programs. Now, the only time I watch ESPN is when there is a game in which I have some interest. I suspect I'm not alone in shying away from them. It really begs the question, does this approach REALLY increase viewership over actually behaving as a responsible purveyor of sporting news? Shit, we have one of the largest, if not the largest, fan bases in the country.
Upvote
0