OregonBuckeye;2319083; said:Hale vs. Goebel: Push. Similar styles of play and backgrounds. I think Hale has slightly more raw talent but Goebel had a lot of games under his belt.
Bennett vs. Hankins: Likely downgrade. I love Bennett's potential but his health is always a concern and I don't think his superior quickness makes up for Big Hanks ability to control the LOS.
Spence vs. Williams: Leaning towards upgrade after hearing the initial spring practice reports but Nate had a really underrated year. He was relentless and physical. Not sure if Spence will quite replicate that toughness
Washington vs. Simon: Downgrade. Simon's motor, leadership, experience, and work ethic just can't be replaced. Not to mention he was also just a damn good football player. 9 sacks in 11 games while battling through chronic injuries. Who knows how many sacks and TFL's he would've had if he was healthy? Washington clearly has some talent but he's not coming close to bringing what Simon did to the table
Overall: Downgrade. I'm expecting a good year with signs of an even better one in '14
I agree with most of your statements, but I believe that schutt may start over hale and that could be an upgrade. And the one thing that you didn't bring up is the young depth we have along the line as well, that we didn't really have last year. Our young talent also has some experience which it didn't have last year.
Its very hard to compare washington to simon because simons leadership and work ethic can't be replicated by a sophomore just yet. But athletically they don't compare. Washington is far superior in athleticism and size and how he can be used. Simon made many plays with his work ethic and will. It was amazing watching how undersized he was and seeing what he could do. But idk if he wouldve fared the same against top tier sec talent, imo like washington can and should. Next year will be very exciting for us fans, hopefully simon showed these guys the right way and spring ball shows us something big to come from this D line
Upvote
0