• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Disgraced Former Penn State DC Jerry Sandusky (convicted child molester)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
BB73;2165540; said:
Does anybody believe that the length of the investigation and the timing of bringing the charges had nothing to do with allowing JoePa to get win #409 before the shit hit the fan?

There should be an investigation of the investigation, conducted entirely by non-PSU and non-Pennsylvania folks.
Click to expand...

Normally I don't believe in conspiracies (unless they involve NBA officiating) but in this case the timing just seems comically non-random, doesn't it?
 
Upvote 0
http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=36&tid=155717174&mid=155717174&sid=890&style=2

167278.gif
 
Upvote 0
Jerry Sandusky trial: Mike McQueary says he get '3 distinguishable looks' of Sandusky in shower with young boy

Defense attorney Karl Rominger continued his cross-examination of former Penn State assistant football coach Mike McQueary this afternoon at the child sexual abuse trial of Jerry Sandusky.


The line of questioning focused on details of McQueary's accounts to law enforcement and a grand jury of a shower incident involving Sandusky and a young boy.

Rominger asked McQueary about the angles in which he saw Sandusky with the boy, how old he thought the boy was and the date the incident happened, which was officially changed from March 2002 to Feb. 2001 by Judge John M. Cleland last month.

McQueary grew impatient with Rominger's line of questioning about the boy's age. At different times, McQueary has been on the record as saying the boy was 8 to 13 years old, 10 to 12 years old and 10 years old.

"If we want to argue about 9, 10, 11 or 12, the fact is, he had sex with a minor," McQueary said. "A boy."

"I think 8 to 13, 10 to 12 and 10, I'm not a math major or anything, but I think that's the same age."

Rominger also pressed for more details on the angles in which McQueary witnessed the incident. McQueary said he got "three distinguishable looks."

"They were engaged [in a sexual position] in two different looks, and on the third look they were disengaged," McQueary said. "As time goes on, you want to give as much detail as you can possibly give. And that's what I've done."

McQueary stepped down from the witness stand just before 5 p.m. Today's afternoon session is still in progress.
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
When is the appropriate time to begin questioning whether the B1G should continue to be associated with Penn State?

The cover-up encompasses the entire university and the community. They were basically an ancient Greek City-State endorsing Sandusky's perverted activities.
 
Upvote 0
Jerry Sandusky trial: Coach says Sandusky 'jumped like a rabbit' when he walked in on incident in weight room

For a split second, after he went back to his car and contemplated just seeing Jerry Sandusky and a boy in his son's grade lying face-to-face on a wrestling mat after hours in a Keystone Central school weight room, coach Joe Miller hesitated.




Why would they be there? No one is supposed to be there after hours, he testified at Sandusky's child sex abuse trial Tuesday.

"Then I thought, well, it's Jerry Sandusky -- he's a saint," Miller testified. "What he's doing with these kids is fantastic, so I didn't think anything of it."

So he dismissed it. Never told anyone -- not even his wife.

Not until that boy, now known as Victim 1 of 10 in the Sandusky child sex abuse case, came forward and made allegations, did Miller recount his story to an investigating grand jury.

He told it once more Tuesday during the trial, giving credibility to Victim 1, who emotionally testified earlier in the day and recounted that incident for jurors, too.

Victim 1 said Sandusky had brought him to the room to work out, but he wanted to climb a rock wall. Sandusky lifted him from the wall as he was climbing, and put him on the ground where they were when Miller interrupted, he testified.

He said Sandusky "jumped like a rabbit" when Miller walked in.

And when Miller testified, attorney Joe Amendola asked him if that was an accurate characterization.

Miller said yes.
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
OH10;2165570; said:
When is the appropriate time to begin questioning whether the B1G should continue to be associated with Penn State?

The cover-up encompasses the entire university and the community. They were basically an ancient Greek City-State endorsing Sandusky's perverted activities.
Click to expand...

Everyone here has already been doing so. I think maybe after the trial is finished and the e-mail trail is investigated, such that everyone knows what the UP, the VP, and the AD knew and when they knew it, will be that time. I imagine the B1G offices care more about the University power structure than the football coaches, etc. with regard to their knowledge in this matter and what, if anything from the B1G end, to do about it at the institutional level.
 
Upvote 0
if you're joe amendola, how do you really live with yourself during this whole thing? you know the guy did it. you know the guy did it repeatedly to a large number of children. how do you really go out there and brow beat young adults that were repeatedly molested, just in hopes that there are enough ignorant hilljacks, with joe paterno's face tattooed on their calf, on the jury that will let this guy return to society.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top