• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Disgraced Former Penn State DC Jerry Sandusky (convicted child molester)

Muck;2037892; said:
Big mistake dipshits.

Oh and he looks like a child molester.

BuckeyeNation27;2037897; said:
Don't they realize that part of the problem is that everybody is a disciple of Paterno? Good Lord.....it's like they're trying.

Dryden;2037904; said:
nepotism.jpg

This criticism would make more sense when they eventually fill the position permanently. Interim positions are pretty much never filled by outsiders, and even if they were, you're not going to get somebody from outside to step into this mess right now.

ScriptOhio;2038009; said:
Police: No reports from Mike McQueary

A central Pennsylvania police chief says his department did not receive a report from then-Penn State graduate assistant Mike McQueary related to an allegation of child sexual abuse against former defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky.
McQueary, now the Penn State wide receivers coach who was placed on administrative leave Friday, had told a friend in an email that in 2002 he stopped the alleged rape of a boy he thought to be about 10 years old and discussed the matter with police.
.
.
.
"He didn't come to State College police. The crime happened on campus and we don't have jurisdiction on campus," King said. "We've had no reports (of Sandusky sexually abusing someone) from anybody."
The university also has its own police force, and said they have no record of any police report filed by McQueary.
"This is the first we have heard of it," said Lisa Powers, Penn State's director of public information.
In the email, first obtained and reported Tuesday by The Morning Call of Allentown, Pa., McQueary said he "did have discussions with police and with the official at the university in charge of police" after the alleged incident.
In the email, dated Nov. 8, McQueary said, "I did stop it, not physically, but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room," The Morning Call reported.
McQueary did not specify which police department he spoke to.

Entire article: http://espn.go.com/college-football...rd-penn-state-mike-mcqueary-reporting-assault

I don't buy McQueary's email. You don't make a complaint like that and then continue to work at Penn State for nearly another decade.
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2038163; said:
This criticism would make more sense when they eventually fill the position permanently. Interim positions are pretty much never filled by outsiders, and even if they were, you're not going to get somebody from outside to step into this mess right now.



I don't buy McQueary's email. You don't make a complaint like that and then continue to work at Penn State for nearly another decade.

Agreed regarding McQueary. Seems highly unlikely that anyone would witness something like that, report it, and then continue on working there when nothing is done about it.
 
Upvote 0
Irony. The cultists had a hand in bringing these allegations to light. And here we all thought it was the work of haters in the media.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/17/sports/ncaafootball/internet-posting-helped-sandusky-investigators.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all?src=tp

Working off the brief mention on an Internet forum where people chatted about Penn State athletics, according to the two people with knowledge of the case, investigators narrowed their list of coaches likely to have seen something to Mike McQueary, then an assistant coach and the football program?s recruiting coordinator.

I for one commend the investigators for finding this lead amid all of the discussion of how best to fill a balloon with piss, and whether or not it's possible to win a game by scoring only field goals when the other team gets at least one touchdown.
 
Upvote 0
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/17/s...ssault-in-sandusky-case.html?ref=ncaafootball

Ben Andreozzi, a Pennsylvania lawyer representing one of eight boys alleged to be victims in the Penn State sexual child abuse case, called Jerry Sandusky a ?coward? on Wednesday and said that Sandusky?s recent comments on television had emboldened his client to pursue sexual assault charges against Sandusky.

?Mr. Sandusky suggested in some of his comments about the victims that maybe people were backing off,? Andreozzi said in a telephone interview from his office in Harrisburg. ?My client heard that and has dug in his heels. He is feeling more comfortable about going through with this. The comments maybe backfired. They have caused victims to be more motivated to testify against him.?
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2038204; said:
Irony. The cultists had a hand in bringing these allegations to light. And here we all thought it was the work of haters in the media.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/17/sports/ncaafootball/internet-posting-helped-sandusky-investigators.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all?src=tp



I for one commend the investigators for finding this lead amid all of the discussion of how best to fill a balloon with piss, and whether or not it's possible to win a game by scoring only field goals when the other team gets at least one touchdown.

Reading that article convinces me that Joe, Curley and Schultz entered into a conspiracy to cover up the shower incident. The first thing I do if I am Curley or Schultz is contact my general counsel to make sure my next step does not land me in court. The fact that they didn't speaks volumes.
 
Upvote 0
sflbuck;2038222; said:
Reading that article convinces me that Joe, Curley and Schultz entered into a conspiracy to cover up the shower incident. The first thing I do if I am Curley or Schultz is contact my general counsel to make sure my next step does not land me in court. The fact that they didn't speaks volumes.

For a second there, when you listed Joe, Curley and Schultz, I thought you were comparing Penn State administrators to the Three Stooges.

The more I think about it, it seems to fit.
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2038204; said:
Irony. The cultists had a hand in bringing these allegations to light. And here we all thought it was the work of haters in the media.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/17/sports/ncaafootball/internet-posting-helped-sandusky-investigators.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all?src=tp



I for one commend the investigators for finding this lead amid all of the discussion of how best to fill a balloon with piss, and whether or not it's possible to win a game by scoring only field goals when the other team gets at least one touchdown.

The whole article is a compelling read --

Paterno, through his son Scott, also said he did not know of the 1998 sex crime investigation of Sandusky, who was then his most prominent and accomplished assistant.

Investigators over the last week have made clear that they have serious doubts about whether so few people in senior positions of responsibility came to know of the 1998 investigation.

regarding the investigation into Second Mile's stored records:

Much of the older paperwork was stored at an off-site records facility. The travel and expense records, for instance, had been sent over several years earlier. But select members of the charity?s board of directors were alarmed to learn recently that when the records facility went to retrieve them, some of those records ? from about 2000 to 2003 ? were missing.
The attorney general?s office was notified of the missing files, people with knowledge of the case said. Subsequently, the foundation located apparently misfiled records from one of the years, but the rest seem to have disappeared.

(Cough) Cover up? (Cough)
 
Upvote 0
Wow, could it be that more and more people are involved across all fronts? This could be a lonnnnng investigation. And I wouldn't be surprised to see the number of people "covering up" or "hiding" information become a MUCH larger number.

Don't give me these so called "higher ups" didn't know about the earlier investigation. Word of that kind of information spreads like wildfire, from within the university (faculty/staff/students/etc) to local, to state, to nationally. Something is fishy about this.
 
Upvote 0
Good for the victim/boy/man who is going to push for the charges. With the ass hole taking this situation as passive and "I don't give a f" attitude. I hope every victim goes all out on this POS
 
Upvote 0
sandgk;2038233; said:
The whole article is a compelling read --



regarding the investigation into Second Mile's stored records:

The travel and expense records, for instance, had been sent over several years earlier. But select members of the charity's board of directors were alarmed to learn recently that when the records facility went to retrieve them, some of those records from about 2000 to 2003 were missing.
The attorney general's office was notified of the missing files, people with knowledge of the case said. Subsequently, the foundation located apparently misfiled records from one of the years, but the rest seem to have disappeared.

(Cough) Cover up? (Cough)

Wonder if travel and expense records just cover members of the 2nd Mile staff, or if anyone on the trip would be named. If some of their celebrity backers tagged along with Sandusky on trips with kids, those records could be incriminating.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeMac;2038281; said:
Good for the victim/boy/man who is going to push for the charges. With the ass hole taking this situation as passive and "I don't give a f" attitude. I hope every victim goes all out on this POS

According to Sandusky's lawyer, there are some victims supposedly recanting or saying it never happened, so hopefully the ones that are full speed ahead stay that way. Of course I would have thought that any first hand knowledge of anything regarding the victims in the case would be tampering with witnesses, but what do I know...
 
Upvote 0
Bucklion;2038301; said:
According to Sandusky's lawyer, there are some victims supposedly recanting or saying it never happened, so hopefully the ones that are full speed ahead stay that way. Of course I would have thought that any first hand knowledge of anything regarding the victims in the case would be tampering with witnesses, but what do I know...

You can't unsay it and hope it goes away. When a grand jury interviews you and then you change your tune, I assume it is perjury. Not to mention the list of victims is growing..not shrinking (see link below).

http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/dis...ndusky-victims-far-back-1970s-contact-lawyers
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Back
Top