Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Here's the thing with Napoli, Francona said that he was the "heart of this team" before Game 3. On a team built like this, that is not to be discarded easily. Chemistry, maybe more than anything save the bullpen, was the biggest reason this team got as far as it did. Now, he was obviously a HUGE liability on the field in the WS. So, I don't say you give him a sizeable contract. However, if he can be had back on a reasonable deal to pinch hit 1-3 times a week and be a "glue" guy, like Giambi in '13, I say you have to do it. No way should he be playing on anything resembling a regular basis next year, though.Made me sick this morning to hear Jim Donovan on the radio talking about how much they need to pay Napoli to come back next year. Guy is a 3 month regular season player who was the LVP when it mattered. Let him walk.
Yeah, sure, if you could do that...but they were talking 7-8 million for one year deals at the end of the season on the radio. I don't care if he's the designated fluffer, he ain't worth thatHere's the thing with Napoli, Francona said that he was the "heart of this team" before Game 3. On a team built like this, that is not to be discarded easily. Chemistry, maybe more than anything save the bullpen, was the biggest reason this team got as far as it did. Now, he was obviously a HUGE liability on the field in the WS. So, I don't say you give him a sizeable contract. However, if he can be had back on a reasonable deal to pinch hit 1-3 times a week and be a "glue" guy, like Giambi in '13, I say you have to do it. No way should he be playing on anything resembling a regular basis this year.
I guess the question will be what the market for him will be. I can't imagine with the way he faltered down the stretch, and utterly failed in the post season it will be too robust. But this is MLB, so who the hell knows...
Well, they do get Brantley back. Who knows what he brings, but he is still reasonably young, so I would hope he can come back strong. Zimmer is generally expected to be ML ready sometime next year. So, unless they bring somebody in, the rest of the OF will probably be piecemeal.So what do we need? It seems like a bat. i wouldn't be opposed to letting Nap walk and filling with someone else.
Are any prospects ready to make the jump (Zimmer?).
Not for that much, hell no.Yeah, sure, if you could do that...but they were talking 7-8 million for one year deals at the end of the season on the radio. I don't care if he's the designated fluffer, he ain't worth that
I dont have much hope for the offense next year.
Its basically Kipnis, Lindor, Santana and a cast of nobodies
Who knows if Brantley will ever be the same, right now ill assume he has Grady Sizemore syndrome until proven otherwise.
Jose Ramirez had a great season but I dont think we can realistically expect a repeat.
Chisenhack is well Chisenhack
Guyer can hit lefties but is cooked against righties.
Im convinced Naquin is offense Jeremy Sowers, the league has figured him out.
If they are stupid and fork over money to Napoli he's not going to hit 30+ HR with 10p RBI again
Whoever plays catcher is a lost cause.
Basically we are relying on them to get lucky with bargain FA signings again.
Yeah, sure, if you could do that...but they were talking 7-8 million for one year deals at the end of the season on the radio. I don't care if he's the designated fluffer, he ain't worth that
Well, they do get Brantley back. Who knows what he brings, but he is still reasonably young, so I would hope he can come back strong. Zimmer is generally expected to be ML ready sometime next year. So, unless they bring somebody in, the rest of the OF will probably be piecemeal.
I hope the front office recognizes the need for another bat to play out there, but I expect they'll view Brantley coming back as just that. Who knows, maybe they get a wild hair up their ass and spend like they did before 2013 with Bourne and Swisher...but I suspect considering how poorly those contracts played out that's a serious longshot.
He was trying to get a double play with a pitcher who isn't particularly good at getting them.
Oh, I'd bring him back for one year and 8, I wouldn't think twice about it.
What we NEED to not be doing is ALWAYS making him the #4 hitter.
So, by your logic, Lindor, Kipnis and Santana won 103 total games including 10 in the playoffs with a bunch of nobodies. Doesn't matter who they put with them. So, we should be ok there.
Brantley is indeed a who knows. Maybe he's the next Joe Charboneau. Why limit your comparisons.
Guyer is a lefty match up guy, thanks for noticing.
Good old Lost cause Catchers. They're not important at all. Do you watch baseball? If I had to rank them in order, even with no hits, Perez was probably about the 7th most important player in the post season. Only Lindor, Kipnis, Kluber, and the 3 bullpen guys to me obviously had a bigger impact.
Naquin and Jeremy Sowers. Really? You can't even come up with another flash in the pan hitter? Shouldn't we be talking Franklin Gutierrez and Ben Francisco? well, I'm pretty sure those guys never flashed in the pan. Naquin unless I'm mistaken, has more MLB games than AAA games played. He's not just a rookie, but a buck ass rookie. He's got a good swing... its up to HIM to adjust, and we'll see if he can. He's a match up guy right now too.. so, who knows. (Also, did you really think Jeremy Sowers was gonna be worth a broke dick? Stuff wasn't there. Ever. At all.)
The catches are a lose cause offensively, not defensively though.
I enjoy your optimism but I just don't see next year going well.