Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
OH10;2171119; said:If you think the mechanics aren't a legitimate concern for MKG, you're wrong. It may be something that can be fixed or it may not. But it is absolutely a concern if you're taking him that high.
He averaged a little over 11 pts/gm for a loaded UK squad. So I'm not going to hammer him for his production. But he's not shown the ability to score 20+/gm at the next level' especially if teams can back off him like they probably will do.
At the end of the day, your team needs to be able to score. You're not going to win consistently in this if you have to rely on Kyrie to put up 30+/gm while you're defense holds your opponent to 80. With Jamison gone, who on this team besides Kyrie can score? And who on this team can shoot?
I like MKG if we had some perimeter scoring from the 2-guard postion but we don't. He's just not a good fit with Kyrie. We need someone who can shoot and there are 2 guys in this draft who can do just that.
Brutus1;2171171; said:Nah, we need to be entertained until the draft.
Brutus1;2171178; said:It's easier reading the thread, than pm's.
buchtelgrad04;2171179; said:Really, isn't that what message boards are for? To go back and forth?
OH10;2171192; said:M.S. Boyer/J. Valade @PDcavsinsider
Jay Bilas on possible #Cavs draft choice Harrison Barnes: "I think he'll be a better pro than college player."
M.S. Boyer/J. Valade @PDcavsinsider
ESPN's Jay Bilas calls possible #Cavs draft choice Michael Kidd-Gilchrist "relentless'' and says guys don't come along like him very often
M.S. Boyer/J. Valade @PDcavsinsider
But Bilas says MKG has "got to fix that shot.''
M.S. Boyer/J. Valade @PDcavsinsiderESPN's Jay Bilas on possible #Cavs pick Bradley Beal: "How can you not need a guard who's got that kind of ability?'' Loves Irving-Beal bkct
buchtelgrad04;2171179; said:Really, isn't that what message boards are for? To go back and forth?
AKAK;2171185; said:Certain posters have a history of, let's say, negatively hijacking this thread "going back and forth" on what are really increasingly trivial points.
Do we really need to be discussing someone's particular version of Kawhi Leonards development over the last couple years in painful minutae?
Does this have ANYTHING to do with MKG?