y0yoyoin;1825804; said:colt mccoy has looked good so far as well...and thats why i think we should get a WR...Hillis is the future...you cannot call hardesty a bust when he has been injured and hasn't even played one snap in the NFL yet...our defense has been built for the most part thru trades and free agency...i like our defense and we do need more help in alot of different areas but i think for Colt to get better he needs more weapons...every great QB has a great receiver to throw too....guarantee next pick the Rams make will be at WR...browns are a handful of teams in the NFL without a proven WR (oakland, st louis, seattle) so depending on our pick position, Green or Jones could even be gone by the time we draft....if i had to take something other then a WR for the browns in the first round i would hope we take a DT that can play in the 3-4 or whatever hybrid scheme ryan comes up with at the time
And he may not, he could be KiJana Carter V2.0...we'll just have to wait and see. I hope he comes back, but how many knee procedures can a RB recover from and still be an effective back?
And I would say there are a lot more teams than the 4 you list that don't have true #1 WRs. Chicago doesn't have one. SF doesn't have one until and unless Crabtree gets his act together. The Jets? Santonio is clutch, but is he a true #1? Buffalo? Tennessee? San Diego? Denver?
Now looking at some teams that do have one: Carolina, 1-10. Arizona, 3-8. Dallas, 3-8. Detroit, 2-9. Hell the Bungles have 2, and they are 2-9. Now there are a lot of problems on all of those teams that WRs can't solve, so my point is simply that with a team rising from the ashes of Jokeville like the Browns are trying to do, I think we can add a solid FA and not overpay for a WR that may or may not produce at the expense of other significant team needs, of which the secondary, DL, and right side of the OL remain paramount.
Upvote
0