• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Charlie Weis (ex-Kansas HC, ex-Fla OC, Notre Dame legend, UnDecided Schematic Advantage)

You can't make this stuff up...

Weis says Irish must be in discussion for national championship next year.

Success for Notre Dame football does not necessarily mean playing for the national championship every year, but it does mean being in the discussion for a Bowl Championship Series berth, coach Charlie Weis said Friday.


pg2_a_weis_65.jpg
Weis



"I don't think you can be just a mediocre team at Notre Dame. I'm not saying you're playing for the national championship game every year. But you have to be in the discussion," Weis said before the team's football banquet. "If you're not in the discussion, I don't think that's what anyone who went to Notre Dame or roots for Notre Dame would ever be looking for."


The Irish, whose 20 year championship drought is the longest in school history, went to BCS bowls during Weis' first two seasons. The past two years, however, the Irish have gone 3-9 and 6-6, leading to speculation Weis might be fired despite having seven years left on his 10-year contract.


Weis admitted he had a restless night's sleep after the 38-3 loss to USC on Saturday when he stayed in Los Angeles to recruit. He traded text messages with athletic director Jack Swarbrick when he woke up in the middle of the night. After two recruiting visits Sunday, Weis talked to the Rev. John Jenkins, the university president, by telephone on Monday. Then he met with Swarbrick in San Jose, Calif., to discuss his future and the future of the program.


Weis and Swarbrick didn't see eye-to-eye on everything, but agreed generally on what changes need to be made, Weis said. Weis, like Swarbrick earlier in the week, declined to talk about what changes will be made other than to say some of the changes would be obvious and others more subtle.


Jenkins and Swarbrick wants to know three things from Weis: whether he would be happy returning to Notre Dame; what would be his commitment if he came back; and whether he would be accountable.


"I told them without a doubt that I would be happy to be here and would appreciate the support of Father John and Jack," said Weis, speaking to the media for the first time since after the USC game.
Weis said he's confident he can be successful.


"I don't think it's going to be five years down the road or 10 years down the road for that answer to come to fruition. Because you've gone from three wins to six wins, now what's it going to be?" he said. "I think we'll all have a better answer for that question sitting here this time next year."


Continues
 
Upvote 0
I've bolded the games I think are at least a 50% chance of a ND loss:

cincibuck;1347638; said:
Sept. 5 NEVADA

Sept. 12 at Michigan

Sept. 19 MICHIGAN STATE

Sept. 26 at Purdue

Oct. 3 WASHINGTON

Oct. 10 Open Date

Oct. 17 USC

Oct. 24 BOSTON COLLEGE

Oct. 31 vs. Washington State (at San Antonio, Texas)

Nov. 7 NAVY

Nov. 14 at Pittsburgh
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;1348103; said:
I've bolded the games I think are at least a 50% chance of a ND loss:

I noticed Washington wasn't bolded. I can understand why after this season.

I think Steve Sarkasian will get a lot mor eout of Jake Locker than Ty could. Jake Locker has to be one of the most untapped players in the country.

If you switched Tebow with Locker, I think you'd have very similar results at each school. Long story short, I think Steve S. will get a lot of Locker, and be a very formible foe to Notre Dame.
 
Upvote 0
OregonBuckeye;1347173; said:
Funny you use him as an example considering it was Weis that came in his junior year.

Weis's main problem is that he can't develop talent. His players show very little improvement with years in the system. You give him a team of developed talent and he can have some success.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;1348103; said:
I've bolded the games I think are at least a 50% chance of a ND loss:

Yep. Little Tuna is catching a big wave of luck. Just when he's down to his last breath the fortunes turn. First off, this is one of the softest schedules in ND history. Even softer than this year's. The sudden (and extreme) decline in talent at Michigan is a significant factor. It's going to be at least another year, possibly two, before they field a top-tier-of-the-Big-10 team.

You know Michigan State will be good to great on defense and they'll have a burner or two in the receiver department. BUT, they won't have an experienced QB and they may not have a 1K running back.

History tells you that Purdue beats ND once, maybe twice, in any given decade, even in the Bob Griese - Drew Briese eras.

I count one sure loss, USC; no worse than 2 -1 against the Big 10 teams, a toss up between the Irish and BC and that's it. With any luck at all he's bound to have a nine win season. With luck he'll win 10 and with 10 he's got an iron clad grip on a BCS bowl.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
"Last year we were a crummy team that very often was noncompetitive. This year I thought we were a decent football team that blew three double-digit leads in games. You are what you are, as Bill (Parcells) always said. But the difference between 6-6 and 9-3 is blowing three double-digit leads."
No Chuckles, the difference between 6-6 and 9-3 is having a good coach.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;1348103; said:
I've bolded the games I think are at least a 50% chance of a ND loss:

Add Nevada to that list. They've taken Boise to the wire two years running now, and their stud qb will be a senior. They'll put up points on the domers, it they can come up with a half-hearted effort on defense (always their weakness) they'll start fat bastard off with a loss at home to a WAC team next year.

I see two certain losses: USC and BC

two probable losses: Pitt and MSU

and four possible losses: Nevada, UM, Pudue and Navy.

I'm guessing 8-4 with a blowout loss in the Gator Bowl.
 
Upvote 0
BB73;1348347; said:
That schedule doesn't show their last 2 games:

UConn and at Stanford

Good point, and I think those are perfectly losable games for ND. UCONN has built up a solid mid-level program. Stanford struggled this year, and I don't know how they look going into next year, but playing at home, I could see Harbaugh pulling the upset.
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye;1348297; said:
Add Nevada to that list. They've taken Boise to the wire two years running now, and their stud qb will be a senior. They'll put up points on the domers, it they can come up with a half-hearted effort on defense (always their weakness) they'll start fat bastard off with a loss at home to a WAC team next year.

Colin Kaepernick will actually be a redshirt junior next year. I agree that with him running the pistol, Ntre Ame will be in for a battle in Suth Ben.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top