• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Cavs 09-10 Season (official thread)

exhawg;1701952; said:
I think that deal was overblown. It sounded like the Cavs had offered Z, JJ, Green and at least a 1st round pick and it wasn't enough. I think Ferry made the best deal he could get.

Could be.

The Suns must be glad they kept him. They're looking pretty good so far.
 
Upvote 0
Ferry definitely made the best deal he could. But you are right, the deal didn't provide Cleveland with another assertive force, who wouldn't be willing to wait and see if Lebron shows up to his potential. At least on the offensive end. Throughout this playoffs I've fully come to respect Andy for what he does on the court.

Maybe Lebron needs that other presence to take the weight off of his shoulders when it's crunch time? It doesn't necessarily have to be in the form of a player...I was thinking maybe more in the form of a coach...

EDIT: 3000'th post!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
jlb1705;1701951; said:
I agree with this. I don't want to see Pierce get going. Plus, I think Rondo would be better at drawing cheap fouls on LeBron and I don't want to see him in foul trouble.

I think the current gameplan for Rondo would work well enough if he wasn't killing them so bad in transition. That's not a matchup problem though, it's a team defense, rebounding, and even an offensive problem.

exactly. rondo shooting 42% on 21 shots in a halfcourt set is exactly what the cavs want, especially when he only shoots about 60% from the line. better offensive execution and more intensity overall, and in transition is what needs to change, not matchups.
 
Upvote 0
exhawg;1701922; said:
I don't care who guards Rondo. Just play off of him and make it hard to drive. If he jacks up semi-open long shots it's a win. When he does drive have one of the bigs give him a hard foul.

I agree with this totally. The Celtics won't win if we play off Rondo and force him to take jumpers all night. He's not that good of a shooter. We need to keep him from driving the lane and getting layups or kicking to a wide open teammate.
 
Upvote 0
buckeyesin07;1701982; said:
I agree with this totally. The Celtics won't win if we play off Rondo and force him to take jumpers all night. He's not that good of a shooter. We need to keep him from driving the lane and getting layups or kicking to a wide open teammate.

They are challenging him to shoot. Parker has been giving him massive amounts of space. It hasn't mattered. He's gotten to the rim whenever he's wanted too.

And I don't want half-court sets truthfully. We should be running against Boston. When you push tempo, sometimes you get beat coming back. We put up 120+ in game 3 by playing fast and getting a lot of transition buckets. Playing a half-court slug it out game, plays into Boston's hands who will gladly grind it out, but also take the secondary fast-break and kill you if you don't have someone to stop Rondo.

I'd like to see Cleveland pick up the pace, have LeBron pick Rondo up in transition, and if Pierce gets going a little bit, so be it. It's a hell of lot better than 29 points, most coming from the free throw line, and within 5 feet of the hoop, and 13 assists to guys left alone b/c of help D. Take Rondo away, and you've cut the head-off Boston.
 
Upvote 0
buckeyesin07;1702007; said:
Not true. When we've given him a cushion, he's either passed the ball or taken a jumpshot, most of which he's missed.

Ya, I don't agree with this at all. Parker has literally given him 5 feet. He sets up below the free-throw line half the time. But Rondo gets a head of steam, makes one juke, or starts/stops and it's already over. The problem with giving that much space is all takes is minimal effort to even get into the paint. Former Cavs coach John Lucas used to say it's the PG's job to get into the paint every possesion...he was trying to teach Boobie this one off-season as well. But if that's the case, Rondo doesn;t even have to make an effort b/c Parker is so far off.

Not that I have much issue with the way Parker is playing him, b/c he doesn't stand a chance either way. But I'd rather have a guy who can give a small cushion but also make it more difficult to penetrate. Rondo is abusing this team by getting to the rim so frequently....
 
Upvote 0
I will admit that I don't watch that many Cavaliers games until the playoffs but I don't understand what is so special about Mo Williams. I take it he is supposed to be his outside shooting but I just don't see it. I have seen him get hot one time during the series but I thought he was supposed to be better done that. Personally, I think West brings a whole lot more to the table than Williams especially on defense.

I also don't understand why they brought Z back if they were not going to use him during the playoffs. I know that maybe the deal with Washington had to include Z or Washington would not have made the deal but that was just for Washington's benefit to clear cap space. We did not have to bring it back to insult the guy which is clearly being done by not playing him in the playoffs.

We are supposed to be a much deeper team than Boston but I just don't see that excellent coach that we have polling the right trigger. Maybe Chris Jent would like another shot at a HC position. I know that Lebron likes him but maybe just as his shooting coach.
 
Upvote 0
TRON 2.0;1702013; said:
Fail.

Rondo is shooting .517 this series.

Rajon Rondo, shots outside the paint:

Game 1 LOSS: 2/2: 100%
Game 2 WIN: 3/6, 50%
Game 3 LOSS: 3/8, 37.5%
Game 4 WIN: 4/8, 50%

Overall, Rondo is actually shooting a higher percentage outside of the paint than inside. The percentage doesn't really matter all that much though, because the number of outside shots he takes or his ability to make them don't seem to correlate to who wins. Rather, it's his ability to get inside and get easy baskets or draw defenders and get them opportunities for easy baskets.

This is where outside shooting matters - If he's making or taking those shots, that means he's not penetrating. The Cavs shouldn't care if Rondo actually is shooting well from mid-range and beyond. I don't know of a good way to track this other than anecdotally, but the real key is assists in the paint by Rondo. I imagine we would a see much greater correlation between that stat and the Celtics' success than what exists for Rondo's shooting percentage or even the number of shots he takes inside or outside of the paint.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
TRON 2.0;1702013; said:
Fail.

Rondo is shooting .517 this series.

jlb1705;1702029; said:
Rajon Rondo, shots outside the paint:

Game 1 LOSS: 2/2: 100%
Game 2 WIN: 3/6, 50%
Game 3 LOSS: 3/8, 37.5%
Game 4 WIN: 4/8, 50%

Overall, Rondo is actually shooting a higher percentage outside of the paint than inside.

How is his outside the paint higher? Also, hate to nitpick, but I only have him as 1/1 in game 1..
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;1702029; said:
Rajon Rondo, shots outside the paint:

Game 1 LOSS: 2/2: 100%
Game 2 WIN: 3/6, 50%
Game 3 LOSS: 3/8, 37.5%
Game 4 WIN: 4/8, 50%

Overall, Rondo is actually shooting a higher percentage outside of the paint than inside. The percentage doesn't really matter all that much though, because the number of outside shots he takes or his ability to make them don't seem to correlate to who wins. Rather, it's his ability to get inside and get easy baskets or draw defenders and get them opportunities for easy baskets.

This is where outside shooting matters - If he's making or taking those shots, that means he's not penetrating. The Cavs shouldn't care if Rondo actually is shooting well from mid-range and beyond. I don't know of a good way to track this other than anecdotally, but the real key is assists in the paint by Rondo. I imagine we would a see much greater correlation between that stat and the Celtics' success than what exists for Rondo's shooting percentage or even the number of shots he takes inside or outside of the paint.

I agree with this in general. I'll also add that Rondo is only shooting 28% from 3 point land in the Cavs series and only shot 21% from 3 point land in the regular season. Clearly, his taking jumpshots is not his strong suit and is in the Cavs' best interest.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top