sorry about that.....got mixed up after I replied to Thump.Brewster isn't one of the five.
:2004:
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
sorry about that.....got mixed up after I replied to Thump.Brewster isn't one of the five.
ORD_Buckeye;1839141; said:2) After the Sugar Bowl, encourage them to look at their NFL prospects. If they choose to come back, make it clear that the suspension will not be appealed, and there is NO guarantee of their regaining their starting jobs when it is over.
Herbie has gone out of his way to criticize tOSU and tOSU coaches/players for years now. I hope this finally gets him blackballed from the program. Mentioning names on air last night (even if it was mentioned by others, e!spn is a much larger venue) without proof and then this speculation crap today...take a hike company man.Steve19;1839120; said:I listened to the Herbie interview. Clearly, he has issues with Pryor. But, stinging as it is to hear what he says, he is right about several things.
Addition by subtraction? It's too early to tell how this works out, but living your values always leads to strength in the end and the alternative leads to perdition.
Casting aspersions about a fellow Buckeye by wondering aloud "if (Pryor) was the ringleader"? Sorry, Herbie, but you are way over the line on that one.
There have been a few times in recent years, like the ESP!N debacle, when I was disappointed in some of the things that Herbie has said about Ohio State football coaches and players.
Yeah, we're all disappointed in these players. But, Herbie, hearing you bashing the young man, no matter what, was no less disappointing. You really need to pull yourself toward yourself and get your priorities straight.
i think i'm in agreement. i think i want all involved players to be suspended for the bowl game. i don't have all of the information, though. if it were up to me, the decision to suspend the players for the bowl game would hinge upon whether they truly sold their goods in order to help their families. having families in rough economic situations doesn't excuse breaking the rules, but it makes breaking the rules understandable.ORD_Buckeye;1839141; said:Tossing this around for a little bit, my hopes would be as follows.
1) None of them play in the Sugar Bowl. Suspend them for team violations or just let them ride the pine. I'm ok with either scenario. If it means a beatdown by the SEC, so be it. We've survived those before.
2) After the Sugar Bowl, encourage them to look at their NFL prospects. If they choose to come back, make it clear that the suspension will not be appealed, and there is NO guarantee of their regaining their starting jobs when it is over.
3) Find out what the hell happened with those 6 compliance officers we have on staff, and make sure that it is not repeated.
LordJeffBuck;1839101; said:The reason that the players get in trouble for "selling stuff that belonged to them" is as follows ... if they were allowed to sell rings, trophies, jerseys, etc., then the school would have an incentive to provide the players with an inordinate amount of memorablia, i.e. gold pants for every win ... and every loss, too. Instead of Buckeye leaf stickers, how about silver medals instead? And let's loosen up the requirements so that everybody gets a couple of dozen per game.
At some point, the school's giving players "stuff" to commemorate accomplishments is a pretext for giving them commodities that can easily be turned into cash on the open market. Players would have an incentive to go to the schools that gave out the most goodies ... pretty soon you'd have a pretty obvious "pay for play" situation.
ORD_Buckeye;1839141; said:1) None of them play in the Sugar Bowl. Suspend them for team violations or just let them ride the pine. I'm ok with either scenario. If it means a beatdown by the SEC, so be it. We've survived those before.
ORD_Buckeye;1839141; said:2) After the Sugar Bowl, encourage them to look at their NFL prospects. If they choose to come back, make it clear that the suspension will not be appealed, and there is NO guarantee of their regaining their starting jobs when it is over.
ORD_Buckeye;1839141; said:3) Find out what the hell happened with those 6 compliance officers we have on staff, and make sure that it is not repeated.
not good, not bad, id say.Yes.
Where are your seats located?
It wasn't Herbie's fault. If the players had behaved we wouldn't be having this conversation. I think Herbie did what he should have done.NFBuck;1839160; said:Herbie has gone out of his way to criticize tOSU and tOSU coaches/players for years now. I hope this finally gets him blackballed from the program. Mentioning names on air last night (even if it was mentioned by others, e!spn is a much larger venue) without proof and then this speculation crap today...take a hike company man.
tsteele316;1837655; said:really, the major issue is that they floated this out there without anything to back it, and only much later did they actually clarify that they had no real sources that would verify the rumor, and osu/shelly poe flat out denied it.
at all that been put up front in the beginning, they wouldn't look like the total amateurs that they are.
NFBuck;1839160; said:Herbie has gone out of his way to criticize tOSU and tOSU coaches/players for years now. I hope this finally gets him blackballed from the program. Mentioning names on air last night (even if it was mentioned by others, e!spn is a much larger venue) without proof and then this speculation crap today...take a hike company man.