• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2024 College Football Playoffs Discussion (12 Team Format)

It still confuses me why espn chose to go down this path. Why alienate yourself from so many large markets and in the process hurt the overall sport? The downfall of espn is justly deserved.
Maximizing shareholder value. They own all the rights to the SEC's product, and executive management is carrying out their sole legal fiduciary duty to maximize shareholder value. We got off the plantation when we founded the BTN and made it all the way to Canada two years ago when we told them to go fuck themselves and went with FOX-NBC-CBS. It's entirely predictable that they demonize the B1G. The ACC, however, is all-in with espn, and I'm amazed that they don't sue over espn's harmful lobbying to favor SEC teams over ACC teams. Bama over FSU last year. Tennessee over Miami this year. Demonizing the selection of SMU over giving that at-large spot to an SEC team.
 
Upvote 0
Maximizing shareholder value. They own all the rights to the SEC's product, and executive management is carrying out their sole legal fiduciary duty to maximize shareholder value. We got off the plantation when we founded the BTN and made it all the way to Canada two years ago when we told them to go fuck themselves and went with FOX-NBC-CBS. It's entirely predictable that they demonize the B1G. The ACC, however, is all-in with espn, and I'm amazed that they don't sue over espn's harmful lobbying to favor SEC teams over ACC teams. Bama over FSU last year. Tennessee over Miami this year. Demonizing the selection of SMU over giving that at-large spot to an SEC team.
I should've clarified. I'm talking all the way back around '06 when they ramped up the SEC propaganda. I'm fuzzy on the timeline, so I don't remember if the founding of the BTN was what spurred it or was a result of it
 
Upvote 0
I should've clarified. I'm talking all the way back around '06 when they ramped up the SEC propaganda. I'm fuzzy on the timeline, so I don't remember if the founding of the BTN was what spurred it or was a result of it

Read this

Consider them rolled

An amiable session in which the Big Ten and ESPN cleaned up “housekeeping matters” — schedules and announcers — took a nasty turn at the one-hour mark. That’s when talk turned to a contract extension, a negotiating session that went nowhere. Fast.

“The shortest one I ever had,” Delany told the Tribune. “He lowballed us and said: ‘Take it or leave it. If you don’t take our offer, you are rolling the dice.’ I said: ‘Consider them rolled.’ “

Delany had warned ESPN officials that without a significant rights-fee increase, he would try to launch a new channel that would pose competition both for TV viewers and the Big Ten’s inventory of games: the Big Ten Network.

“He threw his weight around,” Shapiro said in a telephone interview, “and said, ‘I’m going to get my big (rights-fee) increase and start my own network.’ Had ESPN stepped up and paid BCS-type dollars, I think we could have prevented the network. In retrospect, that might have been the right thing to do. Jim is making a nice penny on that.”

Said Delany: “If Mark had presented a fair offer, we would have signed it. And there would not be a Big Ten Network.”
 
Upvote 0
The ACC, however, is all-in with espn, and I'm amazed that they don't sue over espn's harmful lobbying to favor SEC teams over ACC teams. Bama over FSU last year. Tennessee over Miami this year. Demonizing the selection of SMU over giving that at-large spot to an SEC team.
Lobbying/defending a conference about to enter hospice care is not a great investment, though the optics are not great.
 
Upvote 0
...
Greenstein notes Delany in '06 "went back to the negotiating table with Wildhack," ESPN/ABC Sports President George Bodenheimer and Exec VP/Content John Skipper. They "hammered out a 10-year, $1 billion deal for roughly 40 football and 60 men's basketball games." Another 35-36 football games and more than 100 men's basketball games "went to the BTN, which launched Aug. 30, 2007."

Delany "sent a package to Shapiro that included champagne and a note." Shapiro said the note read: "See, I did it."

Shapiro said, "My reaction was: Who does that? It was so juvenile. I sent the note to Bodenheimer and poured the champagne down the drain." Delany said that Shapiro's "recollection of the note isn't accurate." Delany: "That's not how I would express myself. What I wrote was tongue-in-cheek. I believe it was: 'Enjoy the champagne while enjoying the network.' It wasn't juvenile at all. We did toast to Mark, and I was thanking him"

:slappy: Drink up, Disney.
 
Upvote 0
A good read.



ESPN having pretty much all control over the CFP and the narrative is absolutely part of making the sport less appealing.

I wouldn’t doubt if the committee stuck SMU in there this year cause they knew they likely would get pummeled and in the future they can use that as a reason to put some mediocre 3 loss SEC teams in instead of a 2 or maybe even 1 loss ACC or Big 12 teams. SMU landing on their face sets the tone for that for the rest of time.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top