• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2023 tCun Shenanigans, Arguments, Cobras, Feckless Marmots, Fake Pandas, Dirty Cheaters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not to take a heaping dump in anyones Cheerios here, but reading these responses, people seem to have an awful lot of faith in the NCAA all of a sudden…and I’m not sure where that comes from
From the Letter:

E. The NCAA Provides Its Evidentiary Conclusions to the University and the Conference About the Scheme

On November 2, a senior Conference staff member and I participated in a call with NCAA President Baker, other senior NCAA staff members, and the University’s Athletic Director, General Counsel, and outside counsel. During that call, the NCAA informed the Conference and the University that, based on its investigation and the evidence it had collected, the NCAA “knew and could prove” the following:

• the staff member participated in and coordinated a vast off campus, in-person advance scouting scheme involving a network of individuals;
• he purchased and forwarded tickets for games involving future University football opponents, and the tickets were for seats strategically located for stealing the future opponents’ signs;
• he and others acting at his direction video recorded signs used by future University opponents while attending the opponents’ games in person; 6
• information, including videos of future opponents’ signs, was delivered back to the staff member by those who had attended the games and taken the videos at his direction; and
• during the time in question, including through the University’s seventh game of the 2023 season, the staff member was present on the University’s sidelines, dressed similarly to University coaches, in close proximity to University coaches, and he communicated directly with such coaches.

In light of this information, the NCAA informed the University and me that the existence of the impermissible scheme by this University football staff member was “uncontroverted.” The NCAA indicated that it was continuing its investigation to determine, among other things, who else knew about and/or was involved in the scheme.
 

Attachments

  • Correspondence_from_conference_to_institution_dated_Nov_10_2023.pdf
    358.5 KB · Views: 4
Upvote 0
That’s the play here.

They gave them a slap right now for embarrassing the conference and then they sent them to their room to be punished by their father when he gets home from work (NCAA).

This is enormous and it’s appropriate
It’s not enough because it allows the cheaters the opportunity to still win something that they spent most of the season cheating at.

I’m so disappointed that there was no postseason (or at least CCG) ban and/or the forfeiture of 4 early B1G games.
 
Upvote 0
this was going to be their response regardless of the severity of the punishment. L'Petite appears to be a novice checkerer.
Yep. It could have been just the 10K fine and no suspension for Simple Jim, and they would still be going ballistic because they can't accept any notion that they're not as pure as the driven snow and that the other schools would dare to question them and hold them accountable.
 
Upvote 0
I'd rather the Big Ten had done nothing and punted to the NCAA. This so-called "discipline" actually helps tCun – their "Us Against the World!!!" morale boost will far outweigh the loss of Booger Eater on the sidelines.

To me this was a predictable. They have already played the victim card. Just to fine them would emboldened their bullshit.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top