As a Michigan fan, I think you have to lean into their current strategy in regards to roster construction.
Is it flashy/sexy? No.
Is it going to produce a ton of high end NFL talent? Not likely.
Will they play physical ass football and be a threat in every game? Yea, it’s a bitch to play them.
Harbaugh has decided to take a relatively anti-OSU approach to building a college program which is an all out National Recruiting strategy intended to make OSU an NFL manufacturing facility.
Michigan will still pump out some guys obviously, but they’re really much more focused on development of players in the trenches, and when necessary (which is quite frequent) going to the portal for grown ass men. When you see Michigan on the calendar you know you’re about to get a heavy dose of 22-23 year old offensive/defensive lineman with 4-5 years of college weight lifting no matter what school it may have been at (in house redshirt in Ann Arbor? Cool. 4 years at Arizona State? We’ll take it? Turned 22 at Stanford? Come on down!!).
If I’m a Michigan fan, and I mean this sincerely…..I don’t really give a shit about recruiting rankings until Harbaugh bails….and then my stomach would plummet. Because as is, Michigan has become the premier program for experienced college players to finish out their careers before trying to make a run at NFL.
I’ve stated it a bunch….but my biggest worry if I’m a UM fan, is that extra Covid year expires pretty soon (2024). I think that is a pretty significant neutralizer….they’re still gonna get 3 and 4 year players with eligibility, but it won’t be to this level like we’ve seen. I also think more guys will be reluctant to transfer for 1 season….it’s worth it for 2 years. Most of the guys Michigan has landed this portal cycle would only have 1 year if not for Covid years.
The problem is that there is literally no evidence available to prove the strategy you're talking about works (except I guess Dantonio? But he's not employed for a reason.)
The fact is the 12-2 team had almost no transfers, and was still built around the premier recruits we have. This year, it was even moreso the same situation; yeah the center was a transfer but guys like JJ, Corum, and Edwards are 100% top tier recruits. Are we good at developing rotational linemen? I'd say we are; but if you're pulling in subpar talent in recruiting, all that means is you might be Iowa/Wisconsin. That's not good enough for the kinda money Michigan spends on football; and everyone knows it.
I'm not trying to fight you, and the Covid thing is a valid point. But right now the program you guys think Michigan is, and our fans want to pretend we're about, simply doesn't exist. College football works on a 2 year lag from recruiting. What we've done these past two seasons is very much about the 18 class punching above its weight, and 19-20 being decent enough classes, but top heavy with ballers.
This year? We're taking corners who can't really run and guys who do track, etc. I don't think you can use what happened the past two years to predict anything at all about Michigan's performance going forward; we're actually NOT recruiting as well as we were even two years ago and we're not winning ANYTHING with the transfer portal YET. Next year, the elite players from 2020 are still there; but after that? All bets are off.
Edit: so I spent a little more time thinking about what you wrote, and I guess I can see how guys like Ronnie Bell, and even Mason Graham are good examples of Michigan targeting and developing guys who fit our system and thus the rankings not mattering as much. I still think it's important to note however, that the vast majority of the guys driving the 2021 and 2022 teams, are actually 4 and 5 star recruits. I think it does work to fill in the gaps in our recruiting; what scares me however is if you have back to back classes devoid of those elite anchors to build around. Last year we at least got Will Johnson. This year? Your guess is as good as mine, that class is brutal.