Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Washington - 56 Runs 343 Yards
Rutgers - 38 Runs 112 Yards
Wisconsin - 44 Runs 112 Yards
Nebraska - 42 Runs 204 Yards
Northwestern - 54 Runs 294 Yards
Total - 234 Runs 1065 Yards 4.5 Yards Per Carry
Their 2 best performances came against 2 completely terrible run defenses, Washington #108 and Northwestern #122
But yea they are cranking out over 40 runs per game at <5 YPC
47 carries per game at 4.5 ypc and a passing "attack" throwing it 25 times a game for 6.3 ypa
The best part of all this vast overreaction to plain old mediocrity by the DFBIA is that it will ensure Jimmy stays in place for a few more years no matter how badly they get humped into submission from here on out.
They'll find ways to rationalize the losses.
DFBIA won't be the only ones to consider it a victory.Harbaugh can go 9-4. Losing to Sparty, Peds, Ohio State and bowl game and still enough DFBIA will consider it a victory.
NotADuck
October 26th, 2021 at 10:09 AM ^
It feels like this Michigan rushing attack is unprecedented. 2 running backs on pace for over 1000 yards and nearly 20 touchdowns each. Has that ever happened in the history of college football? Not including those teams from WW2 era and before, back when teams ran the ball 90 percent of the time.
Even if it were true, the game has changed a lot in 19 years. Some things that worked back then wouldn't fly nowadays. I can't imagine a team winning a NC with a starting QB who threw only 12 TDs and 7 picks in a season. That's just impossible to do today
goblue2121
October 26th, 2021 at 10:02 AM ^
Tressel made a huge mistake by playing Krenzel over Justin Zwick. Zwick would have allowed them to call the touchdown play more. He turtled his way to a NC and beat one of the most talented teams in the CFB history in the NC.
https://www.mgoblog.com/mgoboard/michigan-football-team-similar-2002-nc-osu-team-clarett
The D in DFBIA question posed
Is this Michigan football team similar to the 2002 NC OSU team with Clarett?
Theres some REALLY stupid posts in this thread, a few of my favorite
Even if their style of play is (tangentially) similar, this is a totally different era in CFB. It's not even remotely the same game. In 2002, the "spread offense" was still exotic. Fullbacks and the I-Formation were still a thing. Most teams didn't have playmakers all over the field on offense and defense. For as great as that 2002 team was, does anybody think they'd run the table and win a NC in 2021? *Spoiler* They wouldn't. scUM's Kroger brand of 2002 tOSU football is going to get a rude awakening over the next several weeks.
https://www.mgoblog.com/mgoboard/michigan-football-team-similar-2002-nc-osu-team-clarett
The D in DFBIA question posed
Is this Michigan football team similar to the 2002 NC OSU team with Clarett?
Theres some REALLY stupid posts in this thread, a few of my favorite
"call the touchdown play" aside, they spent the entire thread listing the ways they're nothing like that OSU team, and how much further behind their kind of team is in this era.
It feels like this Michigan rushing attack is unprecedented.
…
Bonus question; how well does a 47 carry a game based offense work if they are playing from behind?
The 1973 Oklahoma Sooners had two RBs with over 1000 yards (Joe Washington, 1173; Waymon Clark 1014), and QB Steve Davis added 887 yards ... in an 11 game season. So yeah, not really unprecedented. But definitely a throwback to the good old days of the Wishbone offense.It feels like this Michigan rushing attack is unprecedented. 2 running backs on pace for over 1000 yards