Bear Catlett Wrote:
(Yesterday 09:22 PM)franzeal Wrote:
Like that mattered. Here you go thinking college football's a sport and not a popularity contest run by some dickwads.
UC could have beaten the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on the road and we'd still be ranked lower than Ohio St and their signature win over Jerry Sandusky St.
Maybe it would have mattered, maybe it wouldn’t have mattered.
But why the fvck didn’t this team pummel both Navy and Tulane?
There really is no excuse for the lackluster performances.
And regardless if it mattered or not, it certainly gave the CFP a talking point to use against UC that they never should have had.
If UC would have taken care of business it would have forced the CFP to come up with something even more unbelievable to justify screwing UC.
"taking care of business" means winning.
UC took care of business.
This isn't a soccer match or a f-ing Miss America contest. Wins & losses are what matter.
Even if you want to look at other metrics, UC is 9th in the country in scoring offense and 2nd in scoring defense. UC has a better scoring differential than any team except... Georgia.
There's nothing else UC could have done on-the-field; this was entirely an off-the-field decision.
Unfortunately this is not the case for a G5 team. There's a different set of rules for us vs. the P5. It's not good enough to barely beat teams, particularly ones in the bottom 1/4 of FBS. And the timing of these games is most problematic. If we had this 2 game stretch early in the season and then just came off a big win against ND this week I think it would be a different story unfortunately.
Again - UC has the 3rd highest scoring differential in the country (I missed Ohio State earlier). After Georgia (the undisputed #1) and Ohio State, there is no one in the country who is doing a better job of blowing teams than UC is.
Oregon's scoring margin is 8.9 points per game. UC's is 24.3 points per game