• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2017 College Football Playoffs (and Other Bowl Games)

I think we don't belong in the playoffs this year, because of the late loss to Iowa. Look I know Bosa was kicked out, but still it was bad. I think our recruiting with the 2 big defensive line players from Georgia and Florida will help us get over the top next year to add to Young and Cooper. We still don't have the front 4 of Clemson or Auburn this year. Next year is the year.

I think our front four are fine. It's the 2nd level that has hurt us much of the season.
 
Upvote 0
Lol. The committee can’t come out and justify putting Bama in by saying “Well, they are Bama and they are usually really good. We know they have no CCG and 0 wins against top competition, but I mean, they’re Bama.”

They will have to justify their reasoning against the criteria: SoS, CCG, resume, etc.


Dunno about that. I could see their reasoning being:
1) They play well in space
2) They have moxie
3) They pass the eye test
4) The first guy off the bus looks scary
 
Upvote 0
You mean like one that would win another 80 straight games and would never be in doubt no matter who they played? Splitting hairs.

At the end of the day, would I take that Iowa loss and a handful of top ten wins over an unproven Bama that got smacked by the only team worth their weight that they played all year long? You’re goddamn right.

Also, the asshole thing is comical considering your childish jabs. CTRL+F me a river. :cheers:
CTRL+F
You having a clue

Nope.

CTRL+F
Me saying games would never be in doubt

Nope.


Maybe your keyboard is broken.
 
Upvote 0
Not sure I follow that thinking. In a beauty contest between OSU and Alabama, on the margin it helps us a little more if Alabama's loss was to a three-loss, non-conference champ Auburn, not to a two-loss, conference champ Auburn. It probably is such an incremental difference that it'd never matter. But I still think it's in OSU's best interest for Georgia to win.


This UGA/Auburn thing can go either way. Probably #1 is better for OSU

1. Like a lot of people have pointed out, a 3 loss Auburn makes Bama's weak schedule look even weaker.

2. On the flip side, with a UGA win, the top of the SEC then looking a little murky (as far as who really is the best team in the SEC?), it could give the committee justification to put 2 1-loss SEC teams in that have not played, even pairing them at #2 and #3 to settle the debate in the semi-final.

That being unlikely though bc I'm not seeing OU and Clemson being taken out of the #1 and #2 slots if they both win. Only if Miami was to beat Clemson, then Miami @ #4

Damn, I hope TCU pulls a rabbit out of their hat this weekend. Sure this team has holes but Buckeyes don't shy away from any team. I don't want to go to a Bowl game I know we should win, I'd rather have a shot at the whole damn thing. Surprised at the amount of people who are content playing in a Bowl game against a team we expect to beat. Got news for u, any team OSU plays in a non CFP game is going to be less talented and have something to prove. OSU should be favored and I don't like this team when they are the hunted, but rather doing the hunting, playing with an edge. Big reason I think they may be in trouble vs. Wisconsin. Wisconsin feels disrespected, everyone expecting them to fall.
 
Upvote 0
CTRL+F
You having a clue

Nope.

CTRL+F
Me saying games would never be in doubt

Nope.


Maybe your keyboard is broken.


166.gif
 
Upvote 0
Presuming this weekend's conference title games go "chalk", you're sitting in the committee room choosing between Alabama and OSU. You forgive OSU's Oklahoma loss because OKie is in "the show". But you can't get the thought out of your head of OSU laying an egg to Iowa. But you do recall the comeback against Penn State, and the dismantling of the Spartans as well as several other "controlled" games. Then you have Bama who controlled most of their games but only had to "get up" for one worthy opponent and they couldn't. And worst of all it's your LAST memory of Bama because they were on their couch this week. And the 4 week old shit stained underwear of Iowa City has been through the wash cycle a few times.

Then suddenly it occurs to you that in the 3 year history of the CFP no conference has gotten 2 teams to "The Show", least of all with a team that just lost what was essentially a quarter final game to the other team in the final 4 from their conference. And as much as you love you some Bama you just can't set that precedent. So you hold your nose and you pencil in the Buckeyes as the lessor of 2 Evils. And then Auburn fans rejoice, blow their playoff wad early and the SEC is shut out of the Championship Game entirely.

A man can dream.
 
Upvote 0
If you get rid of divisions, then you will have years with really bad unbalanced schedules. It's bad enough that Wisconsin gets a free pass to the CCG every year already avoiding 3 of the 4 of OSU, Mich, PSU and MSU every year.

Well, maybe there shouldn't be 14 teams in the Big Ten?

B-1-G! B-1-G! :roll1:

Not picking on you. Just not a fan of "super conferences" that produce unbalanced schedules and use divisions to create races and pseudo-championship games. But I know why they exist, and that they're not going away. It's all about the Benjamins.
 
Upvote 0
There are no elite teams this year, so the Buckeyes have a chance in the playoffs. When they play well, (like against Sparty or PSU second half) they can beat anybody. The media talking heads love to mention the 55 points Iowa scored, but they almost never mention the 48-3 beatdown of Sparty. CBS showed the final score of tOSU-TTUN as 21-20 on their broadcast a couple of hours after The Game had ended - who couldn't notice that before it was aired? Honest mistake? But their Aflac trivia question that game was this: "Which teams have the most different winners of the Heisman" Answer: 7 for ND and USC (counting Bush's which was supposedly vacated, OK), but no mention of tOSU's 7 Heisman trophies or Archie's pair because they didn't want to give the Buckeyes any credit.

And ESPN compares Bama's and tOSU's records by looking at top-40 results (4-1 Bama and 3-2 tOSU, which doesn't include tOSU's win over Wiscy which is needed to make the comparison relevant). They could include records against the top-10 after the CCGs, but 0-1 for Bama vs 2-1 for tOSU doesn't fit their pro-SEC/anti-BIG10 agenda. I know bkb has pointed out the Mercer thing, it would have been nice to play a team like that between Penn St. and Sparty instead of Iowa on the road.

Clemson seemingly gets a pass because their QB was hurt in the bad loss at 4-8 Syracuse. When your offense is built on running the QB, you've got to be prepared to play without him, like tOSU was on Saturday (and in 2014 :sneaky:).

I agree with the post that buckeyesin07 made earlier in this thread, though. ACC and SEC winners are in, losers are out. Wiscy-tOSU winner is in, and Oklahoma is playing for themselves while TCU is likely playing for Bama's playoff chances. The one thing I'm surprised I haven't heard from ESPN is the head-to-head issue in case tOSU and TCU win, so that Oklahoma could lose and still get in over tOSU. The Big-12 created their bogus automatic rematch CCG in order to get a boost before the playoff selection, but it could burn them if TCU wins and they get nobody in because Bama takes the spot over TCU and Oklahoma.
 
Upvote 0
***If*** the Buckeyes beat Wisky and make the CFP the icing on the cake would be Hocutt sayin' the tipping point was 'bama playing cupcake Mercer the week before Auburn.

btw, 2018 they have The Citadel week 11 also Arkansas State/UL Lafayette and Louisville at a frickin' neutral site Orlando, FL !@#$%^&* Hopefully this is the year the committee starts punishing the entire SEC for total fraud scheduling. Saban never plays an OOC really good team at an away site. Next year they're not playing an OOC really good team period.

Reading/Listening to sports media minutiae the past two days most agree 'bama is out regardless! Karma!

Fuck 'bama !!!
 
Upvote 0
As long as Bama is out I can deal. If they are the team in and we're out, I'll be pissed. Yeah we lossed a big as game at Iowa but it was a true conference road game after a tremendous national implications conference game. We didn't schedule a single FCS team, even though UNLV wasnt very good - still almost bowl qualified. Army is decent and would probably beat half the dogs on Bama's schedule.

It all comes down to what weighs more: Quality wins, or Bad losses
 
Upvote 0
***If*** the Buckeyes beat Wisky and make the CFP the icing on the cake would be Hocutt sayin' the tipping point was 'bama playing cupcake Mercer the week before Auburn.

btw, 2018 they have The Citadel week 11 also Arkansas State/UL Lafayette and Louisville at a frickin' neutral site Orlando, FL !@#$%^&* Hopefully this is the year the committee starts punishing the entire SEC for total fraud scheduling. Saban never plays an OOC really good team at an away site. Next year they're not playing an OOC really good team period.

Reading/Listening to sports media minutiae the past two days most agree 'bama is out regardless! Karma!


Fuck 'bama !!!

I was going to point out that Bama destroyed Meatchicken at Jerry World a few years back, but then I remembered that you said that Bama never schedules a good OOC team. :lol:
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top