If head-to-head match-ups decide who is the better team, does that mean that WVU is better than Baylor? Does it mean that LSU is better than Wisky? Does it mean that Ole Piss is better than Bama, VaTech is better than OSU???? I think all of those are a huge no. Some times a team doesn't show up to play, and sometimes a bad team gives is everything that have (last two cases). Sometimes one team is winning by a lot and then takes the foot off the gas and the other catches up, and before the better team gets going again, it's too late to stop the momentum (first two cases). In all of the cases the better team lost. How did Baylor get to be 21 pts behind with 11 to play if they were the better team? They won once TCU went into prevent/ drain the clock mode. FSU came back from a least 2 games this year when a team went into prevent defense too early. I would call the other team, the better team in those games.
But if you have 2 teams with the same record, and many common opponents that they've both defeated, head-to-head does seem a rather obvious and fair tiebreaker.
It's also the case in the other 4 conferences, that head-to-head definitively puts one team above the other in pecking order.
AuTX beat me to it...
Upvote
0