Dispassionately, ESPiN set out to destroy tne value of the B1G. In the Clarett affair, they repeatedly trumpeted allegations as fact, even after the NCAA had investigated and disproven the allegations twice. Look at the paltry discounts that Pryor and a few players received and that coverage. Now, explain the silence--even rationalization supporting-- sales of items autographed by SEC players or the Cam Newton affair.
Tressel received a heads up about his players from an attorney that broke confidentiality. The player, a former walkon player at Ohio State many years before, was later prosecuted. Tressel did not further break confidentiality. He did not erase the email or hide it. He spoke to his team, as a group, immediately about NCAA rules.
What did he do to bring ESPiN's disgusting campaign on himself? He refused to cave in to their recasting of one of our least successful quarterbacks ever as a former star or to allow him to play insider and broadcast from practices. He kept winning football games with defense, which didn't really make for as many TV advertising breaks. He instilled community service and high moral ethics as values in his players and took Ohio State to the top of APR ratings.
There was no culture problem. Period. It was primarily disproven but constantly repeated nonsense.
Go look at the thread in the archive or even the ESPiN thread for this year with an open mind. Look at the two absolute arse kickings that ESPiN's two top teams in college football, until their string of losses, got yesterday. Witness their silence on the weakness of the SEC.
Then show us objectively that there is no pro-SEC bias.
Tressel received a heads up about his players from an attorney that broke confidentiality. The player, a former walkon player at Ohio State many years before, was later prosecuted. Tressel did not further break confidentiality. He did not erase the email or hide it. He spoke to his team, as a group, immediately about NCAA rules.
What did he do to bring ESPiN's disgusting campaign on himself? He refused to cave in to their recasting of one of our least successful quarterbacks ever as a former star or to allow him to play insider and broadcast from practices. He kept winning football games with defense, which didn't really make for as many TV advertising breaks. He instilled community service and high moral ethics as values in his players and took Ohio State to the top of APR ratings.
There was no culture problem. Period. It was primarily disproven but constantly repeated nonsense.
Go look at the thread in the archive or even the ESPiN thread for this year with an open mind. Look at the two absolute arse kickings that ESPiN's two top teams in college football, until their string of losses, got yesterday. Witness their silence on the weakness of the SEC.
Then show us objectively that there is no pro-SEC bias.
Upvote
0