• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2010 tOSU Recruiting Discussion

Well this is gonna be a smaller class, and it's just plain bad luck when the two guys who are probably the two best prospects in Ohio this year (Hicks and Turner) might not be in our class because Hicks is from the south and might go to childhood favorite Texas, and Turner might have some off-field issues that get his schollie pulled allegedly. That and the fact that this isn't the most loaded Ohio crop we've had in the past few years could hurt us. But on the brightside we could pull a national top 10 player in Joyner, we have a good shot at Hicks, Turner's schollie is still good and he could turn things around and be a part of this class, and our chances at James and Ware are pretty good as well I'd think. I definitely agree the potential is there for this to be a down year, but losing guys like Brunetti, Welch, Hendrix maybe, and Gholston who we probably didn't have much stake in in the first place (aside from Hendrix) isn't enough just yet to make that the case. If Tressel can pull in Joyner, Hicks, and if we can keep Turner then this will be another very good class. Flipside it could be another 2007 if we don't get any of those 3.
 
Upvote 0
brodybuck21;1483867; said:
down year is right and that would suck after the momentum we had built with the last couple of classes

I don't see it as a down year for OSU recruiting so much as just a solid class in a down overall year for recruiting, and in a sport with 85 scholarships a 20-man class doesn't make or break a team. You combine a couple of GREAT classes like '08 and '09 with this class which might be a bit heavier on team players than superstars, and you're still fielding a very good team for a few more years. And let's not forget about a guy like Roderick Smith who has the potential to be a real big-timer for this class.
 
Upvote 0
BayBuck;1483893; said:
I don't see it as a down year for OSU recruiting so much as just a solid class in a down overall year for recruiting, and in a sport with 85 scholarships a 20-man class doesn't make or break a team. You combine a couple of GREAT classes like '08 and '09 with this class which might be a bit heavier on team players than superstars, and you're still fielding a very good team for a few more years. And let's not forget about a guy like Roderick Smith who has the potential to be a real big-timer for this class.

youre right and please excuse my pessimism as things will work themselves out. Just venting a little
 
Upvote 0
brodybuck21;1483894; said:
youre right and please excuse my pessimism as things will work themselves out. Just venting a little

It has been a quiet few weeks for OSU recruiting, but I'm looking forward to some new offers and hopefully some commits as camp wraps up, and then next thing you know football season will be about to start again.

:osu:
 
Upvote 0
I think the dissapointing thing is we were starting to think that maybe we could enter USC territory, where 5* recruits want to come year after year and compete against other 5*'s for playing time. But now it's looking like it may not turn out to be the case. Now that pretty much every position has young elite talent on the depth chart it seems to be effecting the high level recruits that weren't huge buckeye leans to begin with.

It should still end up being a top 25 class though. And I still think there's a decent chance it ends up a top 10 class. If it does end up a top 25 type class (with not many more elite recruits), the good side is it could open up a lot of interest from top level talent for some positions next year.
 
Upvote 0
I agree that this class has been a head-scratcher so far. I am not that worried, more like bored about the lack of news, but I would like to list some things that are a little weird for me :

- I know that Tressel has a soft-sell approach but other than Fiedorowicz and perhaps Hicks, we do not get any "Ohio State is recruiting me hard' type of updates from recruits.

It seems like we have offered some guys and did not follow through. A guy like Khairi Fortt, we would have a decent shot and stopped recruiting him. Early offers like Corey Brown, Seantrel Henderson etc. Will those guys even visit our campus?

-Who we did not offer. Guys like Leifheit, Prater, Cooper, Gardner, etc. I think these guys (not sure about Prater) claimed they grew up rooting for Buckeyes and they have pretty good offer sheets. Perhaps coaches do not think they fit our system and I can understand that but I would be pretty pissed off if we offer late in the process when we have no chance.

That brings me to Gholston. I know that this is probably far-fetched and a more likely explanation for his late offer is the Turner situation but that offer seemed like a courtesy offer to me like the one we sent to Norman last year. Everybody knew we had no shot that late in the game like Norman last year, so why the offer? It is almost like we are trying to legitimize MSU's recruiting. It is perhaps an enemy of my enemy thing, like Woody Hayes did with Notre Dame.

One last observation, it seems that only two recruits (right now) in midwest/Big 10 territory excluding Ohio we might land is Rod Smith and Chad Hagan. Perhaps Luke Graham if we offer? Still, that is pretty underwhelming for me.
 
Upvote 0
While there might be a number of misses like 2007, OSU is going to have to whiff on Joyner, Smith, Hicks, Ware, Anderson and a few others to make the classes comparable. I really don't see them missing that many.
we do not get any "Ohio State is recruiting me hard' type of updates from recruits.
We got it from Montana.
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;1483924; said:
While there might be a number of misses like 2007, OSU is going to have to whiff on Joyner, Smith, Hicks, Ware, Anderson and a few others to make the classes comparable. I really don't see them missing that many.
We got it from Montana.

I think you just let a secret of BPRT slip to us common folks there :wink2:
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;1483924; said:
We got it from Montana.
On the other hand a lot of rumors suggest that he didn't even get to meet JT. Granted, JT's not the one who puts in most of the efforts recruiting, but how seriously do we take Montana's comments when he doesn't even meet the head coach?

I really hope for Corey Brown, Rod Smith, Matt James and Jordan Hicks in this class. Only time will tell what happens.
 
Upvote 0
ant80;1483936; said:
On the other hand a lot of rumors suggest that he didn't even get to meet JT. Granted, JT's not the one who puts in most of the efforts recruiting, but how seriously do we take Montana's comments when he doesn't even meet the head coach?

I really hope for Corey Brown, Rod Smith, Matt James and Jordan Hicks in this class. Only time will tell what happens.

He didn't get to meet face to face but he did get to talk to him on the phone. It's not like Tressel was trying to avoid him. You have to remember that Montana's visit was unofficial when JT was away from campus and there were also the stories of JT talking to papa Montana so I'm not sure why not having a face to face would stop you from taking comments seriously.
 
Upvote 0
keylime_5;1483888; said:
Well this is gonna be a smaller class, and it's just plain bad luck when the two guys who are probably the two best prospects in Ohio this year (Hicks and Turner) might not be in our class because Hicks is from the south and might go to childhood favorite Texas, and Turner might have some off-field issues that get his schollie pulled allegedly. That and the fact that this isn't the most loaded Ohio crop we've had in the past few years could hurt us. But on the brightside we could pull a national top 10 player in Joyner, we have a good shot at Hicks, Turner's schollie is still good and he could turn things around and be a part of this class, and our chances at James and Ware are pretty good as well I'd think. I definitely agree the potential is there for this to be a down year, but losing guys like Brunetti, Welch, Hendrix maybe, and Gholston who we probably didn't have much stake in in the first place (aside from Hendrix) isn't enough just yet to make that the case. If Tressel can pull in Joyner, Hicks, and if we can keep Turner then this will be another very good class. Flipside it could be another 2007 if we don't get any of those 3.

I agree, just cause for concern. These guys may not end up being a big deal but they very well could be imo because, as I said, many might have been the option B (Brunetti, Gholston) or option A's (Welch, Montana, Hendrix). Many times the difference between option A and option B is slight...but once we get into option C and D, then I think you start seeing the falloff. Agreed on the in state recruiting, it just may be partially bad luck. If we miss Hicks, probably not our fault. Same with Turner. However, I think James and Ware should be feasible and both would be huge pickups. I personally think the top notch talent is as good as it's been in awhile top 5 (Hicks, Turner, Norwell, James, Ware) but the depth may not be there, though I think you have some decent talent in the 6-15 range (Donnal, Baldwin, Williams, Welch, Hendrix, etc.).

Cinfali;1483923; said:
I agree that this class has been a head-scratcher so far. I am not that worried, more like bored about the lack of news, but I would like to list some things that are a little weird for me :

- I know that Tressel has a soft-sell approach but other than Fiedorowicz and perhaps Hicks, we do not get any "Ohio State is recruiting me hard' type of updates from recruits.

It seems like we have offered some guys and did not follow through. A guy like Khairi Fortt, we would have a decent shot and stopped recruiting him. Early offers like Corey Brown, Seantrel Henderson etc. Will those guys even visit our campus?

-Who we did not offer. Guys like Leifheit, Prater, Cooper, Gardner, etc. I think these guys (not sure about Prater) claimed they grew up rooting for Buckeyes and they have pretty good offer sheets. Perhaps coaches do not think they fit our system and I can understand that but I would be pretty [censored]ed off if we offer late in the process when we have no chance.

That brings me to Gholston. I know that this is probably far-fetched and a more likely explanation for his late offer is the Turner situation but that offer seemed like a courtesy offer to me like the one we sent to Norman last year. Everybody knew we had no shot that late in the game like Norman last year, so why the offer? It is almost like we are trying to legitimize MSU's recruiting. It is perhaps an enemy of my enemy thing, like Woody Hayes did with Notre Dame.

One last observation, it seems that only two recruits (right now) in midwest/Big 10 territory excluding Ohio we might land is Rod Smith and Chad Hagan. Perhaps Luke Graham if we offer? Still, that is pretty underwhelming for me.

Great post. I don't understand even offering Gholston when his recruitment was pretty much over. However, I don't think we had a shot with Fortt personally. Henderson and Brown...both guys we have a legit shot at that I hope we aggressively pursue. If we pull off even one, great pickup. Seems we are throwing out some token offers like Luc, Robey, Fort, etc. this year while guys like Leifheit, Prater, etc. are without offers.

jwinslow;1483924; said:
While there might be a number of misses like 2007, OSU is going to have to whiff on Joyner, Smith, Hicks, Ware, Anderson and a few others to make the classes comparable. I really don't see them missing that many.
We got it from Montana.

Agreed to an extent...'07 was such a meltdown because of silent verbals or expected verbals (Brent, Martin, Wright, Barksdale, OT from NJ, etc.). I think we might have just as many misses on first or second round offers, but we just may know we are going to miss them in advance, rather than an AA game meltdown (which I prefer). We aren't whiffing on Anderson, Smith, or Bryant but I could see us whiffing on Joyner, Hicks, Ware, James, Hendrix, Henderson (not sure if that's considered a whiff), etc.
 
Upvote 0
Cincinnatibuck;1483955; said:
He didn't get to meet face to face but he did get to talk to him on the phone. It's not like Tressel was trying to avoid him. You have to remember that Montana's visit was unofficial when JT was away from campus and there were also the stories of JT talking to papa Montana so I'm not sure why not having a face to face would stop you from taking comments seriously.

Having JT on campus would've been beneficial, if for no other reason than to be able to talk to his mother. That was the biggest hurdle in his recruitment.

Very odd year, to say the least. IMO, Gardner should've been offered when he came up here for junior day, and he probably would've accepted shortly after. I get the idea that the staff wanted someone a little more polished, which is fine, but Gardner has impressed everyone who has seen him during the camp circut. Gholston probably would've been a Buckeye, too, if we didn't ignore him at the start. MSU got in on him early, and he was pretty much gone by the time we got around to offereing. I remember reading a story after the OSU camp last year where he said something to the affect of "it was nice to see the school where I'll be playing in college", so it wasn't like he was a Spartan from Day 1. Regardless of our depth at DE, you can never have too many pass-rushers and Gholston is cearly one of the best in the country.

Quarterback and Wide Receiver recruiting are especially befuddling. Going after one qb and one qb only was a huge mistake. Hendrix, Bolden, Brunetti, etc were all un-committed for the past few months while Montana was taking visits, and now they're all pretty much gone. It's honorable that the staff picked one guy and decided to make him "their guy", but you can't tell me that it doesn't irritate the other quarterback recruits we were talking to; these are 17-18 year old kid's with ego's, and most of them want to go somewhere where they feel wanted. As for the receivers, not offering Kyle Prater and Chris Dunkley is baffling to me. Both guys wanted offers, and neither would have been an impossible get; Dunkley especially, with his relationship with LJ. Yet we have offers out to Green, Louis, and a few other Florida kids who we have absolutely no shot at? I just don't get it. Tyrone Williams doesn't have an offer, either, apparently.

Still plenty of time to go, but I'm not feeling great about this class, to be honest. Our best recruit is in limbo, and we aren't even odds on for most of the Ohio kids with offers. Hendrix is a Domer, James might actually be a UC lean at this point, Hicks will be a battle til signing day, and who knows with Ware?

I'll trust the staff, but this is by far the strangest year I can remember for recruiting...
 
Upvote 0
Dantonio did the same when targeting his QB this year. He offered 2 guys, though I believe he pushed harder for Bolden than Gardner. MSU told Boisture that he could get an offer later, and he signed pretty quickly w/BC. Gardner went to um and hopefully MSU gets Bolden. JT didn't really make a mistake going hard for Montana, it's simply circumstance. You also have to consider that recruits know that last year's #1 is the OSU QB.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top