Brennan: Five observations from the week
March, 7, 2011
By Eamonn Brennan
Five observations from the week that was:
1. It?s time, once and for all, to shelve the no-great-teams line. You?ve heard this before. You?ve heard it a lot, in fact. The line has been ubiquitous: ?There are no great teams in college basketball this season.? If hearing the line is tedious, constantly arguing against it isn?t much better. I don?t want to be the guy who keeps bringing this up, trust me. But now that the regular season is over, the entire concept deserves one last thorough dismissal, because the Ohio State Buckeyes are definitively a great team.
If we needed further evidence to this effect, see Sunday?s insane offensive effort against Wisconsin in which Jon Diebler and the Buckeyes only put on the single greatest long-range shooting display in Division I hoops history. (Ohio State shot -- get this -- 14-of-15 from beyond the arc. They scored 1.63 points per possession. Their effective field goal percentage was 83.0, which is as historically insane as anything we?ve seen in the past five years, and probably longer.)
Thing is, we didn?t need further evidence. We certainly didn?t need one of the greatest offensive performances in college hoops history to convince us. Why? Because even if the Buckeyes had merely beaten Wisconsin by, say, 10 points -- even if Thad Matta?s team had simply added another win to their docket -- that was enough. Ohio State would still have finished the regular season 29-2 and ranked No. 1 in the nation. Those two losses would still have come at two of the toughest places to play in the country versus two top-10 teams. In other words, they were the kind of losses that even a ?great? team can suffer without losing much of the sheen of its greatness. Short of an undefeated regular season, the Bucks did just about everything right.
Of course, a national championship is often our best -- sometimes only -- retroactive barometer of greatness. Ohio State may have to win it all in early April to get the sort of historical credit it deserves. But if the Buckeyes fall short of a national title -- if they, like so many other teams, fall victim to the oh-so-crazy nature of the NCAA tournament -- don?t listen to the eventual no-great-teams naysayers. After 31 games, what better adjective do we have to describe this team than, well, great?