• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
Jaxbuck;1245533; said:
How fucked up do you have to be to get redshirted and declared "not ready" by RR after watching those other two ass clowns play QB?

WTF, can he not take a snap and run for his life?


signal06.gif
 
Upvote 0
Just surfin' the web to find Wolverwine nonsense, I found this gem, courtesy of victors2000 over at umgoblue.com

Stadium noise - Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:29 AM

I don't have regular season tickets so I only make a game every here and there and when I do go, it's in different spots in the stadium so I'm not sure how the new construction would impact stadium noise. Listening to the music prior to the game, I noticed more echo than before. I looked at the foundation of the new structures and imagined soundwaves bouncing off the different levels and back into the building. During the game, when we were coming back in the fourth quarter and Threet launched the pass in the endzone to Hemmingway(?) the crowd erupted so lound that I reflexively (is that a word?) covered my ears. It was LOUD! I never heard it so loud.
So, did anyone else notice a difference?

I was also wondering if once the structure was completed if this would lessen the sound of the noise because it would bounce off the side of the buildings and maybe out of the stadium instead of back into the stadium like I percieved the three stories of the structure is presently doing?
Yes, vicdurrs2000, reflexively is a word.

Nothing worse than a dumb scUMmer trying to be smart. If you have to question yourself, maybe you can look it up or another word can be substituted (wait, is substituted a word?)

Really, the entire post is just mind-numbingly stupid.
 
Upvote 0
DDN

Michigan's Rodriguez won't name starter for Miami game


By the Associated Press

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

ANN ARBOR, Mich. ? The University of Michigan football team's defense was supposed to be a strength early in the season, while its offense struggled. If the Wolverines' season had started at halftime, maybe everything would be going according to plan right now.
Instead, Utah gained 313 yards in the first half and held on for a 25-23 win Saturday, Aug. 30. This was even after the Wolverines held the Utes to 28 yards and two first downs in the second half.
"In the first half, I felt like we had some guys who hadn't played a lot, and they were playing a little antsy and slow," linebacker Obi Ezeh said. "There's a lot of things going through your mind, and messing up is one of them.
"But you've got to keep thinking that if you mess up, mess up at full speed. Blown assignments are a big part of the game offensively and defensively."
Cont...
 
Upvote 0
Blade

Article published Tuesday, September 2, 2008
UM needs to be more physical, Rodriguez says
By JOE VARDON
BLADE SPORTS WRITER
ANN ARBOR - After critiquing the film of his first game as Michigan's coach - a loss on Saturday to Utah - Rich Rodriguez yesterday offered a frank assessment of his team. "We're not good enough to play bad and win, I don't care who it is we play," Rodriguez said. "If we play bad, we ain't gonna win. That's where we are right now. We are what you see." According to Rodriguez, the Wolverines played poorly on both sides of the ball in their 25-23 setback. The coach also said he was disappointed in his team's tempo, with too many of his younger players sacrificing aggressiveness to think through assignments. Fifteen Wolverines made their college debuts Saturday, and the entire team was executing the Rodriguez administration's offensive (spread-option) and defensive schemes for the first time against an opponent. "I didn't think we played very physical," Rodriguez said. "I thought we played tentative at times, thinking a little too much. Whether that was because of inexperience or because of unsureness on certain plays, we addressed that quite a bit [Sunday] with the team, about playing more physical and not thinking as much. "If they won't play faster, won't play more physical, they won't be playing." For the second consecutive week, UM does not have a definitive starter at quarterback. But, based on Rodriguez's comments, Steven Threet is the favorite to start over Nick Sheridan this Saturday against Miami (Ohio). Threet and Sheridan each threw touchdown passes against Utah, but Sheridan was also intercepted once and could've been picked off at least three other times.
Cont...
 
Upvote 0
RR said:
"If we play bad, we ain't gonna win. That's where we are right now. We are what you see."

"I thought we played tentative at times, thinking a little too much. Whether that was because of inexperience or because of unsureness on certain plays, we addressed that quite a bit [Sunday] with the team, about playing more physical and not thinking as much.

Dear G-d! How does the Harvard of the West handle such diction?!!!

"Unsureness" RichRod? Try uncertainty jackass.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
So I heard a rumor that this Terrelle Pryor kid was highly coveted by Rodriguez?

:p

Michigan's entire rushing offense: 25 carries, 36 yards, 1 TD
Terrelle Pryor playing two series: 9 carries, 52 yards, 1 TD
 
Upvote 0
Dryden;1246426; said:
So I heard a rumor that this Terrelle Pryor kid was highly coveted by Rodriguez?

:p

Michigan's entire rushing offense: 25 carries, 36 yards, 1 TD
Terrelle Pryor playing two series: 9 carries, 52 yards, 1 TD

Nah, they don't need him. They have Barwis and some kid that can't beat out Sheridan and Threet.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top