Dryden;1271363; said:
No question, we've been on the short end of the stick in the d-line department, and have been victimized by superior d-lines when on O, but if you laid out the tenets to Jim Tressel Winning Football 101, OSU hasn't done any of the important things right in the six losses going back to 2005 (Texas, @Penn State, Florida, Illinois, LSU, @USC).
# Won field position battle? Nope.
# Won turnover margin? Nope.
# Committed fewer penalties? Nope.
# Superior special teams? Nope.
# Tackled well/played assignments? Nope.
What do every single one of these games have in common? Uncharacteristic mistakes that we're not supposed to see from a Jim Tressel team: Missed FGs, blocked FGs, pick-6s, TDs nullified by penalties, TOs leading to easy scores, shanked punts, short kickoffs, big kick returns ...
Even in some of the "big" wins. the team has struggled with these facets of the game:
UM, 2005:
# Won field position battle? Push, OSU Avg Start - own 23, UM avg. start - own 26 --- Only once all game did either team start beyond their own 37.
# Won turnover margin? Nope, OSU - 2 turnovers, UM - none
# Committed fewer penalties? Nope, OSU 5-50; UM 3-20
# Superior special teams? Nope, missed XP, missed FG, 19-yard punt from own 20 setting up UM's go ahead TD
FINAL - 25-21
ND, 2005:
# Won field position battle? Nope, OSU - avg start own 23, ND avg start, own 26, including once at OSU's 15.
# Won turnover margin? Nope, OSU - 2 turnovers, ND - none
# Committed fewer penalties? Nope, OSU 7-53, ND 6-48
# Superior special teams? Nope, 2 missed field goals
FINAL - 34-20
Texas, 2006:
# Won field position battle? Yep - OSU avg start own 32, Texas avg start own 20 - only 1 possession for UT started beyond their own 23!
# Won turnover margin? Yep, OSU - none, Texas - 2
# Committed fewer penalties? Nope, OSU 8-55, UT 4-39 - although you could throw out the helmet-to-helmet garbage call on OSU. :p
# Superior special teams? By a bit, did miss a field goal, but AJ Trapasso avegared 50+ yards per punt.
FINAL - 24-7
UM, 2006:
# Won field position battle? Nope, OSU own 26, UM own 35, with two of those starting inside OSU's 25
# Won turnover margin? Nope, OSU 3, UM none
# Committed fewer penalties? Push, OSU 4-50, UM 5-45
# Superior special teams? Push - nothing remarkable either way
FINAL - 42-39
UM, 2007:
# Won field position battle? Eh, push - OSU own 30, UM own 28 - both teams had one possession starting around midfield, but nothing dramatic
# Won turnover margin? Nope, OSU 1, UM none
# Committed fewer penalties? Yep, OSU 3-40, UM 4-45
# Superior special teams? Slight edge to OSU - no missed field goals, nothing dramatic
FINAL - 14-3
In the last three UM games, UM has not committed a single turnover and OSU has committed 6, but OSU is still 3-0. Weird.