Jaxbuck said:

but, I mean, it was up hill right? You were both lucky and grateful to get it?

Come on man, you are scaring me

Click to expand...

OREGONSOCKPUPPET said:

Now it changes from "but whatever" to "but do what you want".
View attachment 94375

I'm moving on though. Good talk.

Click to expand...

BuckeyeNation27 said:

Cool. It was a restating of my point, literally followed up with, but do what you want. Let's keep going back and forth, though. It makes a certain teenage girl from Georgia grumpy.

Click to expand...

colobuck79 said:

Was the bag of cash worth it?

Click to expand...

Jagdaddy said:

When I was a kid, we’d buy it from our neighbors a few houses down the street who had a small farm. We’d get a half gallon, more or less, in a metal cannister, which we’d bring back empty, for 40 cents.

Click to expand...

Crump's brother said:

Raw milk is where it's at

Click to expand...

Captain Buckeye said:

I just don’t get people thinking Texas has the better offense. Why?

Click to expand...

Crump's brother said:

Raw milk is where it's at

Click to expand...

OREGONSOCKPUPPET said:

You stated the following:

"I'll never understand this sentiment. Why is one better than the other? Being an in your face dickhead isn't any better or worse than pretending you're not a dickhead. Both are dickheads."

You gave your opinion which is completely fine. I'm cool with that. You asked a question and I answered it with my opinion.

After my opinion, then you followed up with,

"Which shouldn't garner any respect. But whatever."

I guarantee if I agreed with you on the first post you made, there wouldn't have been a second post. You already knew where I stood and I already knew where you stood.

Makes plenty of sense to me. But whatever

Click to expand...

GeorgiaBuck2 said:

According to Google, the way you used the word "whatever" is interjection/slang, to show apathy, or to dismiss a point. So not really lol. Seems like a passive aggressive way to try and end the argument on your part. But what do I know?

Click to expand...

Buckeye86 said:

I appreciate how the Harvard of the West geniuses immediately blame the coaching staff without a flicker of thought towards the impact a checked out diva at QB has on not only the effectiveness of the called plays, but the ability to even fully open up the playbook they were promised in the first place.

Click to expand...

pnuts34 said:

And honestly, Bryce is their best option at QB for that offense. Whitt like Urban love their QBs to run and be used as extra offensive weapons. Tommy Carr is not the type of QB that is good for a Whitt offense, that kid is a spread air it out type of QB. Utah was #2 in team rushing last year, and their QB was the 2nd leading rusher. That fits Underwood more than Carr. But I know disgruntled fans will always want the backup to play and won't pay attention to scheme. You have a terribly inaccurate, immature, high paid QB who has nothing more than elite athleticism, and his backup is a pro style, spread gunslinger. And the offense is setup as a heavy RPO style which is set up for Underwood, but he's just not very good

Click to expand...

Jagdaddy said:

Nondairy milk (oat milk, soy milk, pea milk, almond milk …) tastes lousy.

Click to expand...

Jaxbuck said:

The problem for them is that Urban's offense stopped working against good teams about 10 years ago.

It's why he brought in Day.

Click to expand...

Jagdaddy said:

Need to also avoid special teams, specifically return game, fuckery.

Click to expand...

Tomateaux Quinoa Gumbeaux said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

Captain Buckeye said:

I just don’t get people thinking Texas has the better offense. Why?

We have the better OL from what I can tell, the better QB (spare me Texas), the better WR group overall (although Texas may have 2 of the top 3), and IMO the better back.

At best it’s a push at OL, RB, TE with a buckeye advantage at WR and QB.

This is a game of inches, and if everything holds similar pattern give me Julian’s decision making over Arches all day. Should’ve thrown 2 picks vs Texas State and comparing his fall footage (where their offense struggled every scrimmage vs their defense and I think their secondary is just good to average) he has been throwing INTs late across the middle.

As long as OSU avoids fumbles which Texas did a nice job at week 1 there’s no reason this has to be close like everyone says.

Click to expand...

pnuts34 said:

And honestly, Bryce is their best option at QB for that offense. Whitt like Urban love their QBs to run and be used as extra offensive weapons. Tommy Carr is not the type of QB that is good for a Whitt offense, that kid is a spread air it out type of QB. Utah was #2 in team rushing last year, and their QB was the 2nd leading rusher. That fits Underwood more than Carr. But I know disgruntled fans will always want the backup to play and won't pay attention to scheme. You have a terribly inaccurate, immature, high paid QB who has nothing more than elite athleticism, and his backup is a pro style, spread gunslinger. And the offense is setup as a heavy RPO style which is set up for Underwood, but he's just not very good

Click to expand...

BuckeyeNation27 said:

I mean....you were chastising me. Call it what you want.

I said it's not an admirable quality, but whatever.......meaning you can admire whatever you want, it just makes no sense to me. Then you came in telling me how it's ok to hold the exact opinion i'm holding. Made no sense, but whatever.

Click to expand...