sparcboxbuck
What happened to my ¤cash?
And for what might now be the craziest tweet of the day, I submit:
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Boom. Fuck off, media
Boom. Fuck off, media
Have you ever hear of a police officer including inaccurate details in their report? I feel like pretty much every report there is something a little bit off.Btw, what is this “police narrative”? Hard to read the article, but didn’t the Dispatch just take the police report? Police narrative are her words in 2015.
Well, someone has a similar thought.Btw, what is this “police narrative”? Hard to read the article, but didn’t the Dispatch just take the police report? Police narrative are her words in 2015.
One theory...This is odd. Why the anonymous release? If not Courtney, who? And why?
I’m just so baffled by all of it. All for Zach fucking Smith.
Well, someone has a similar thought.
One theory...
To go back to the tweet about Courtney Smith being scrubbed from the report in my previous post, it is the worst kept secret in the world that she was scrubbed because Ohio State and basically anyone else not named Snook or related to the Smith’s don’t want to come within 1000 feet of being viewed as attacking Courtney Smith.
Perhaps they are hoping that happens in court and their hands will be kept clean? Who knows.
I don’t see how leaking this report accomplished anything. But I didn’t see how Zach Smith losing his shit on Twitter accomplished anything either. So up is down and down is up. And I better fucking be invited to the 2nd Zach/Courtney wedding because it’s gonna be lit.
Correct. Nobody is going to come within ten feet of saying Courtney lied or exaggerated, despite the fact the report and subsequent text transcripts clearly indicate Urban, Shelley, Gene, and everyone else was suspicious of this and deferred to Powell police to confirm it for an actionable response.
Right? Even at $1600 / hour and $500K for the job, you have to think about how those passages must read. I’m sure it’s professional, but may be very damning to her character.
I’m almost certain that there are statements in there that detail the committee’s view on the veracity of CS’s story. Putting one and one together, if they believed her or any of the story, it would paint Urban as an enabler who overlooked the situation — essentially grounds for dismissal with cause. If they didn’t buy her story and outlined the justification for not believing her, the committee comes off as a sham who were paid to whitewash the situation. The fact that they didn’t publish any of this suggests that they didn’t believe her either, and rather than making it public — and frankly, making her look worse — they could avoid the situation by not releasing anything related to her story. And I think it’s justifiable under the heading of: this happened outside the University domain and as such, that information is not being made pubic. All information regarding happenings within the University domain have been shared.