I?m going to take a little time to get my ideas down on the whole Jim Tressel ?Disclosuregate? business. I?m motivated to do so because I?m a big Jim Tressel fan, and because I?ve heard so much noise from national pundits about the ?scandal at Ohio State caused by Jim Tressel?s failure to disclose? information that ?he knew as much as eight months before? the announcement in December 2010 regarding the memorabilia sale by six Buckeye gridders. Media bloggers, pundits, and others are jumping joyfully onto a bandwagon of critical judgment of all things Ohio State ? surely this shows we are a ?dirty program,? and that Jim Tressel is a ?liar.? Hearing this sort of suggestion from such sources as Paul Finebaum, Senior Apologist for the University of Alabama, can surely be galling to lifelong Buckeye fans like me.
Well, the long and the short of it all for me is simply this: we Buckeye fans are fortunate beyond measure to have a man like Coach Tressel at the helm of our football program. He has time and again demonstrated his deep love and concern for the young men whose parents have entrusted their sons to his care. He has time and again demonstrated his ethical and moral rectitude by placing a higher emphasis on family, team spirit and learning than on on-field performance (though he sure hasn?t disappointed in that last metric). He has never deflected blame onto others ? to the contrary, he has accepted blame when most of us would be flabbergasted by the idea of doing so.
Returning to this specific situation, it is true that he has admitted that he put a number of considerations above ?NCAA compliance? in the hierarchy of priorities; though he didn?t phrase it this way, let?s list what those priorities were:
1. Welfare of the student-athletes. This is, and has always been, Number One on the list of what?s important for Coach Jim Tressel. As the parent of a former D1A athlete, I would always want my kid?s coach to have this at the pinnacle of priorities. Tressel has in this case, as he has before, done the right thing by not leaping to conclusions, prematurely suspending kids before all the facts were in, and by not disclosing names nor allegations before the young men themselves had fully acknowledged what they did and when they did it.
2. Respect for the legal system. Coach Tressel was asked by an attorney to hold the information he received as confidential so as not to jeopardize the legal rights of accused individuals. By doing so, ultimately he cost himself a quarter-million dollars and the opportunity to coach two games of Ohio State Buckeye football.
3. Placing a higher degree of importance to investigating a federal drug-trafficking case than to addressing NCAA rules. It seems clear that in the early days of communications regarding this whole mess, the overriding concern was with the possibility that drug trafficking had somehow infiltrated the Buckeye football team. Disclosure of information could conceivably interfered with investigating crimes that truly affect many people in very profound ways.
What could Coach Tressel done differently? I?m sure that in the clear lens of 20/20 hindsight, pundits will rush to propound all the things that they would have done better; decisions they would have made more soundly; disclosures they would have made sooner with absolutely no fear of collateral damage. What absolute nonsense such suggestions are.
Buckeye fans, remember this: no one can say truthfully that they would have made better decisions at the time, given that no one knows the fullness of available information, legal constraints, and other considerations that a major D1A football coach faces generally, and especially that Jim Tressel faced in this specific instance. If a pundit claims otherwise, it is because the pundit wishes to project upon himself a light of wisdom that he or she does not really possess. If a fan of another team claims otherwise, it is simply a symptom of envy, because at heart every such fan must know that his coach can never hope to reach the level of ethical and moral rectitude, nor of critical judgment, that Jim Tressel has reached. If a player for another team claims otherwise, it could be a result of his immaturity, or it could be a symptom of a wish that he could have played for a coach the caliber of Jim Tressel.
Is the consequence of his actions, a two-game suspension and a $250,000 penalty, just? I submit that it is; regardless of the motivations, the outcome of Coach Tressel?s actions was a major violation of NCAA rules. So I don?t question the penalty, just as I suspect Jim Tressel does not question it. If you are a great leader who has made a decision that results in negative impacts, regardless of the difficulties of the decision, you accept the consequences and move on. Jim Tressel is a great leader, so this is what he has done.
Given the appropriateness of the penalty, however, I have to say that there has never been a coach that I?ve been as proud of as Jim Tressel, and I?ve never been as proud of Coach Tressel as I am tonight. God bless Jim Tressel, God bless President Gordon Gee, and God bless The Ohio State University and the Buckeyes.
GO BUCKS!