MaxBuck;1884668; said:It's quite a long way to get from "this isn't the SEC" to "somebody's head is going to roll." I'm sorry, but having the ultimate goal of demonstrating that we aren't the SEC isn't really necessary - that's self-evident. The proper course of action here is to look at the situation holistically and make thoughtful decisions - and firing Jim Tressel wouldn't qualify as a thoughtful decision under any circumstances. It would be knee-jerk.
Did I say JT? I said somebody....If the person withheld the issue and lied about it to the extent that Bruce Pearl did they should be fired regardless of who it is. If it is a scenario where a not too reliable source came with this info in passing then I can see giving JT the benefit of the doubt. However, if it comes out that this was deliberately withheld (and they knew that the allegations are true) then absolutely this individual should be let go.....
Upvote
0