-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter buckeyeinfla
- Start date
- Status
OH10;1971202; said:
the NCAA was investigating him because OSU self reported the initial violations. OSU also investigated Sarniak before TP stepped foot on campus. I think OSU did their due dilligence but who knows.
Upvote
0
OSUK
Sometimes lucid, mostly confused
I just found SI's retraction (of sorts) in the 8/22 edition in the "Scorecard" article.
SI says, "Two days after Emmert's gathering, Ohio State officials were in Indianapolis appearing before the COI for their football sins against the NCAA rule book. Ohio State may not deserve to have the book thrown at it, but until Emmert and the NCAA make that a real consequence for wrongdoing, real reform will remain elusive and the crisis of confidence will continue."
In other words, OSU may not deserve it, but it should be done anyways! Priceless.
But there is the acknowledgement that implies that the "sins" were not of the nature that deserves harsh punishment - which SI could only conclude if they no longer believe the bull[Mark May] they printed a few weeks ago.
SI says, "Two days after Emmert's gathering, Ohio State officials were in Indianapolis appearing before the COI for their football sins against the NCAA rule book. Ohio State may not deserve to have the book thrown at it, but until Emmert and the NCAA make that a real consequence for wrongdoing, real reform will remain elusive and the crisis of confidence will continue."
In other words, OSU may not deserve it, but it should be done anyways! Priceless.
But there is the acknowledgement that implies that the "sins" were not of the nature that deserves harsh punishment - which SI could only conclude if they no longer believe the bull[Mark May] they printed a few weeks ago.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
- Status