westbrock;1968801; said:I was listening to an espn radio affiliate tonight. In its Sportcenter recap when discussing the hearing today Holtzman noted that G Smith said tOSU has not heard anything about additional allegations or particular additional issues being investigated. He then said there was a letter sent by the NCAA, not to tOSU, but to a consultant tOSU hired that the NCAA is looking into other matters and that an additional hearing may be necessary. Take if FWIW given the source.
He's correct. The letter was an internal NCAA letter sent from their Enforcement Department to their Infractions Committee, dated July 13th/14th (depending on which copy you see), and copies of that letter were sent to Gene Marsh (Tressel's lawyer) and Chuck Smrt (an attorney who tOSU is consulting for compliance issues). The letter stated that the investigation was still open, and that the hearing could possibly be delayed. Since the hearing wasn't delayed, that in itself was a good sign.
But according to the Dispatch yesterday, Gene Smith said that those issues have since been resolved. It's believed that those issues were related to the last 1 or 2 guys that were involved with Eddie Rife but not identified in December. Neither one of those 2 guys is still at tOSU.
I believe that the issues which have been identified to date have been resolved. I think the NCAA won't come out and say that the investigation is over simply because they're waiting several weeks to finalize their report, and if they say it's over and then something new pops up before their report is published they'll look silly.
buckeyebri;1968867; said:ESPiN is still saying that the Failure to Monitor is still on the table and could come out of the July letter of additional investigation.
I thought that the NCAA already sent OSU a letter saying that this was not going to happen?
ESPN is talking about a letter on July 13th/14th. The case summary which the NCAA sent to tOSU on July 21st said that "there are no remaining issues regarding either allegation" and "the enforcement staff did not believe a failure to monitor charge was appropriate in this case".
So it seems that ESPN is hanging its hat on the fact that 1 month ago the NCAA said that the case was still open, despite the fact that the NCAA said 1 week later that there are no remaining issues. So good luck to them with that.
All of the documents which I'm referring to are available in the link that is in post 1 of this thread.
Last edited:
Upvote
0