OSUK
Sometimes lucid, mostly confused
Why can't the story be this: Some star players, and perhaps a small percentage of others over a period of several years, broke NCAA rules by cashing in on their status of being athletes. Jim Tressel failed to do what he was required to do when he learned of it, and was dishonest when required to disclose what he knew. It cost him his job. The players have been suspended for their indiscretions and/or have left the program. At this point, there are questions about cars and other activity that have not been fully investigated. If it turns out that Tat-gate and Jim Tressel's single violation of 10.1 are the core and bulk of the wrong-doing, then the guilty have been punished and the program has been purged of the source of these problems. If the athletic and compliance departments were complicit in helping athletes violate NCAA rules, or ignored such situations, Jim Tressel has been violating 10.1 for years on multiple occasions, and if more and worse violations by players are yet to be revealed, then the facts will support a culture of corruption conclusion.
I think it will be the former.
I think it will be the former.
Upvote
0