DiaBuckeye
All-American
KingLeon;1884900; said:It would seemingly be pretty random to just make this up? But I guess without proof we are innocent in the eyes of the law...
My thought was that they weren't just making it up, but rather that they have a sketchy source who simply gave them his his word against JT's, and Yahoo decided to run with it for the quick hits. That's what I hope at least.
schultgb;1884905; said:But then aren't they making the weight of their story depend on the quality of OSU's response? I find it hard to believe Yahoo is banking on a huge university botching its response to the allegations as opposed to breaking the story themselves with all of the evidence. If OSU responds and fills in the holes of the story, Yahoo's undisclosed evidence loses a lot of value. I doubt they would risk sitting on their evidence by gambling on OSU jacking its response up.
Running the story now got Yahoo a lot of hits, but running it with the evidence (as I believe they did with their other probes) would have been even bigger. I just have a hard time believing Yahoo has evidence but chose to wait and hope for OSU to botch the story to blow it up even bigger, at the risk of that evidence being revealed by other means (possibly even by OSU's response).
Exactly. they are a news organization, no? So report the news. Don't sit and wait and try to make things happen, or turn a story into something bigger on a hunch. I just don't see a huge company like Yahoo doing that...
Upvote
0