Former Chair of the Committee on Infractions Gene Marsh (Ohio State alum and current professor at the University of Alabama) says what a lot of people here have been saying for a while now... That Jim Tressel's reputation & body of work will help him in his hearing. The article also points out his violation of Bylaw 10.1 was a reaction to others' violations rather than an originating violation of his own, which separates him from from other 10.1 violators like Bruce Pearl, the majority of which have lost their jobs as a result of their transgressions.
Doug Lesmerises - Cleveland Plain Dealer: http://www.cleveland.com/osu/index.ssf/2011/04/former_ncaa_official_says_jim.html
Doug Lesmerises - Cleveland Plain Dealer: http://www.cleveland.com/osu/index.ssf/2011/04/former_ncaa_official_says_jim.html
Former NCAA infractions chairman says Jim Tressel's reputation may assist him in avoiding severe penalties
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Although history does not work in his favor, Ohio State football coach Jim Tressel may survive his NCAA violations -- precisely because he is Jim Tressel.
A former chairman of the NCAA Committee on Infractions told The Plain Dealer on Friday that Tressel's positive reputation could help him a great deal when Tressel finally appears before the Committee on Infractions, maybe sometime this summer.
"I think if you have a lifelong good record, that should weigh into how things turn out," said Gene Marsh, a 1978 Ohio State graduate who was member of the infractions committee for nine years, and its chairman from 2004 to 2006. "If it doesn't, then what is the use of living life right?"
Marsh, who said he has attended one OSU football game in the last 25 years and has no personal relationship with Tressel, emphasized that precedent does matter. But he spelled out two reasons why Tressel could be viewed more favorably that other 10.1 violators: the nature of the violations he did not report; and the previously solid reputation he built.
Unlike some 10.1 violators, Tressel wasn't lying about or covering up his own act; he was hiding violations committed by his players, a distinction that Marsh said he would find to be important.
Upvote
0