martinss01
blissfully stupid
southcampus;1409801; said:There were times last year when he was SO wide open that you had to wonder if he was wearing camo or something. I can think of several times (against PSU, scUM, etc.) where I was left scratching my head of why he was so wide open. I've heard from other guys that he runs great routes and thought I read a quote somewhere from Malcolm saying that he thought Dane was the hardest guy to guard because his routes are so clean. Every program needs guys like that. He is shifty, runs good routes, and still alive, albeit barely.
Clean route runners like Dane keep zone defenses honest. Hopefully Lamaar can develop into a deep threat and Posey can be our all around guy to give us an arsenal of receivers comparable to what we had in 2005,2006.
he's also faster than i think people give him credit for.
Upvote
0
I had forgotten that even though rosters are trimmed to 105 in the fall, walk-ons are allowed back on the roster after cuts (at least, I think that's the way it works). The traveling squad is the important factor. While Barclay may stand a good chance of being on the team for the season, Sanzo is a lock for the travel roster, barring any unforeseen circumstances. Also, I do think that non-scholie players are a bit more of an uncertainy. Take a hypothetical example of a life altering experience (family crisis, fatherhood, eg), a scholie player with NFL prospects would be more likely to stay with the team, whereas a walk-on may choose to move on. But that's more speculation.