Onebuckfan
classof76
Shazier would have had more tackles if Perry and Grant weren't in his way ..we need LB and Safety help.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bryant may have been a vocal guy for us and I hope this isn't taken as bashing but if he didn't help our defense all of last year and certainly didn't help against cal and Wisconsin this year. Then IMO he wasn't going to be a difference maker for our team this year if he would've been in. Better then Pitt? Yeah, but his play was not the difference between great and poor defense.Biggest personnel thing was Bryant's replacement. They chose the senior, the more experienced one. Could things have turned out worse had we gone with the true Fr? Maybe. But as long we got absolutely no production out of Bryant's old spot we were never winning the NC.
Recruiting ratings are fun on the first Wednesday of February, but that's about all that they are good for. Every recruit enters Ohio State as a 0* college football player. A third of those guys leave Ohio State as 0* players (injuries, transfers, dismissals). Another third develop into mediocre college players (2* and 3*), guys who can make minor contributions. The final third become your starters and major contributors (4*), the core of the team. A third of that final third become star players (5*). So in any given recruiting class, seven or eight guys will become solid college players, with two or three of them becoming stars. The players listed above fall into that middle third (2* and 3*), or at least they should be there, but too many of them have been thrust into starting roles due to injuries and poor recruiting.
Using your logic, the coaching staff should be able to come up with a successful scheme for Melvin Fellows (5*), Dorian Bell (5*), Dominic Clarke (4*), Jamie Wood (4*), Scott McVey (4*), Jamel Turner (4*), DerJuan Gambrell (4*), Kenny Hayes (4*), David Perkins (4*), Se'von Pittman (4*), Najee Murray (4*), and Jeremy Cash (3*).
I know Shutt looked dinged up. Hale was out there quite a bit. Spence had a real problem getting any kind of rush this game. He just doesn't seem to handle big linemen that can move very well.Was it just me or did the DL rotation all but disappear the last several games. It was almost constantly Bosa/Bennett/Washington/Spence... I know these guys are outstanding but we have(had I'm assuming) depth at that position, I thought we would be rotating new DLs every few series?
If we cant develop guys like Apple, Conley, Burrows, Webb, Lattimore, etc. Then I'll wanna make some coaching changes. And when people wanna bash Fickell, you better not forget about Coombs and Withers, they coach the DBs. Guys are just getting beat, missing tackles, and taking horrible angles to the ball. We better slap a band-aid on this for the orange bowl, or else Boyd and Watkins are going to go off.
I remember a time not so long ago, where I looked forward to watching the defense impose its will on the opposing offense. I loved it. I want that back.
I know Shutt looked dinged up. Hale was out there quite a bit. Spence had a real problem getting any kind of rush this game. He just doesn't seem to handle big linemen that can move very well.
Biggest personnel thing was Bryant's replacement. They chose the senior, the more experienced one. Could things have turned out worse had we gone with the true Fr? Maybe. But as long we got absolutely no production out of Bryant's old spot we were never winning the NC.
Curious as to why Burrows came in for Grant and Reeves comes in for Roby. Does it matter in the scheme what side they play? Wouldn't they learn both or is the assignment transition that different?This is what I was thinking...the play just could not have got any worse from that position after Bryant got hurt. Even if Bell played poorly, there would be no drop off and he would be getting valuable experience. I understand giving the spot to the senior when it seems as if its even, but there has to be adjustments when someone repeatedly does not perform. Then there is Grant who I thought played fairly well to start the year and appeared to regress as the season went along...on the other hand Burrows looked to be coming on strong. I definitely would have liked to see Burrows some. Regardless, I really hope to see a heavy dose of Burrows, Bell, and maybe Apple in the bowl to get us ready for next year. You get valuable experience and I just don't see how there could be a performance drop off.